gcc archive
date index for September, 1999

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

September 30, 1999
18:02 About C/getch() JN_Lin
16:37 Re: aliasing warnings: help Joe Buck
16:16 unsubsribe Jean Magny
16:11 Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets (was: undefined reference to `__setbits') Per Bothner
15:44 aliasing warnings: help Zack Weinberg
15:05 Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets (was: undefined reference to `__setbits') Peter Gerwinski
15:00 Re: STL support in gdb Stan Shebs
14:48 Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets Jeffrey A Law
14:42 Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets Peter Gerwinski
14:41 Re: a C routine to optimize GCC for Mike Stump
14:36 Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets (was: undefined reference to `__setbits') Jeffrey A Law
14:36 Re: bitstrings (sets in Chill and Pascal) Peter Gerwinski
14:05 Problems with global variable in shared library Bogus User
13:27 Re: fille errors Toon Moene
13:02 Re: About C/getch() errror Alexandre Oliva
13:02 Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets (was: undefined reference to `__setbits') Per Bothner
12:44 Re: genattrtab.c [Am I on drugs?!?] Jeffrey A Law
12:11 Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets (was: undefined reference to `__setbits') Per Bothner
12:10 Re: genattrtab.c [Am I on drugs?!?] Zack Weinberg
12:07 Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets (was: undefined reference to `__setbits') Per Bothner
11:52 Re: genattrtab.c [Am I on drugs?!?] Richard Kenner
11:49 Re: genattrtab.c [Am I on drugs?!?] grahams
11:48 Re: genattrtab.c [Am I on drugs?!?] Jeffrey A Law
11:38 Re: genattrtab.c [Am I on drugs?!?] Richard Kenner
11:33 Re: genattrtab.c [Am I on drugs?!?] Jeffrey A Law
11:15 Re: genattrtab.c [Am I on drugs?!?] Richard Kenner
10:54 genattrtab.c [Am I on drugs?!?] Jeffrey A Law
10:50 Re: 64 bit Wide mode support for PA RISC 2.0 Jeffrey A Law
10:06 64 bit Wide mode support for PA RISC 2.0 Ullas Ponnadi
10:05 Re: a C routine to optimize GCC for Peter Osterlund
09:03 Re: Chill vs. Pascal sets (was: undefined reference to `__setbits') David Starner
07:28 Stop sitting on cross-compile issues, Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Marc Espie
07:20 I'm having questions regarding use of gcc on ppc. Steven W Orr
06:55 Re: assembler problems with: g++ 2.95.1/Solaris 2.6/ -O3 Mike Moran
04:14 Chill vs. Pascal sets (was: undefined reference to `__setbits') Peter Gerwinski
04:13 gcc/config/i386.h pavenis
03:02 Re: undefined reference to `__setbits' Andreas Schwab
02:48 Re: what does it mean "undefined reference to `xxxx virtualtable'. Emir UNER
02:33 About C/getch() errror JN_Lin
01:58 Re: what does it mean "undefined reference to `xxxx virtual table'. Steinar Bang
01:53 what does it mean "undefined reference to `xxxx virtual table'. Emir UNER
01:20 Successful build of gcc Greg Roberts

September 29, 1999
20:40 Re: lazy execution optimization Jeffrey A Law
19:48 Re: Code much slower. Why? David Ronis
19:07 Re: a C routine to optimize GCC for N8TM
18:12 Re: Code much slower. Why? N8TM
17:48 Re: Code much slower. Why? N8TM
16:55 a C routine to optimize GCC for Vincent Diepeveen
16:49 fille errors K.A. Scott
16:22 Re: assembler problems with: g++ 2.95.1/Solaris 2.6/ -O3 Gerald Pfeifer
16:22 Re: assembler problems with: g++ 2.95.1/Solaris 2.6/ -O3 Alexandre Oliva
14:58 I'm a bit confused by the tree... Marty Leisner
14:43 Re: undefined reference to `__setbits' Peter Gerwinski
12:30 Re: code generation puzzle on alpha Brad Lucier
12:13 code generation puzzle on alpha Brad Lucier
11:36 Re: egcs19990927 Ovidiu Predescu
10:59 Re: '#pragma pack' on AIX David Edelsohn
10:53 Re: assembler problems with: g++ 2.95.1/Solaris 2.6/ -O3 Mike Moran
10:53 Re: egcs19990927 H.J. Lu
10:42 Re: assembler problems with: g++ 2.95.1/Solaris 2.6/ -O3 Gerald Pfeifer
10:38 Re: egcs19990927 Ovidiu Predescu
10:34 assembler problems with: g++ 2.95.1/Solaris 2.6/ -O3 Mike Moran
10:30 re: egcs19990927 James Black
10:29 '#pragma pack' on AIX Andy Rysin
10:09 Re: REGISTER_CONSTRAINTS Jeffrey A Law
09:40 REGISTER_CONSTRAINTS Bernd Schmidt
09:18 Re: allocation on the stack Bruno Haible
08:25 Code much slower. Why? David Ronis
07:10 Re: block merging Joern Rennecke
06:58 re: latest snapshot James Black
06:16 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
06:16 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
06:16 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
06:15 Re: Autoincrement examples Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
04:43 Re: undefined reference to `__setbits' grahams
04:20 Re: undefined reference to `__setbits' Peter Gerwinski
02:56 Re: lazy execution optimization Sylvain Pion
02:02 Option to have gcc print full pathnames on error output? Brian J. Murrell

September 28, 1999
21:13 Re: allocation on the stack Geoff Keating
20:19 Re: Processor information Michael_K_Collison
19:58 >>> Guaranteed Credit Card Approval for 1st 500 applicants < Security4U
17:48 re: STL support in gdb Benjamin Kosnik
16:21 Re: gcc 2.95.1 Alexandre Oliva
16:13 gcc 2.95.1 Brian O'Gorman
13:59 Re: Questions about cpp, cpplib, and precompiled headers Zack Weinberg
13:48 Re: -fno-exceptions and bad_alloc Mike Stump
13:35 Re: Processor information Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:29 Re: -fno-exceptions and bad_alloc Andi Kleen
12:45 Re: -fno-exceptions and bad_alloc Mike Stump
11:53 Re: A new check ? Richard Henderson
10:43 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
10:41 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless David Edelsohn
10:32 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
10:27 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Jeffrey A Law
10:17 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
10:03 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Jeffrey A Law
09:58 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
08:51 Re: Can't install GCC 2.95.1 in Sun Solaris 2.6 Russ Allbery
08:26 A new check ? Marc Espie
08:07 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Jeffrey A Law
06:06 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
04:06 seekg(long long) vs seekg(long) Alexandre Hoflack
03:30 Re: -fno-exceptions and bad_alloc Andi Kleen
02:59 Can't install GCC 2.95.1 in Sun Solaris 2.6 Eric Chow
02:01 GNU Fortran (g77) Status craig
01:24 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Jeffrey A Law
01:21 Re: undefined reference to `__setbits' Jeffrey A Law
01:09 gcc-ss-1999-09-27 is now available law

September 27, 1999
20:40 Re: allocation on the stack Mike Stump
19:56 Re: gcc-ss-19990927 is now available Jeffrey A Law
19:50 gcc-ss-19990927 is now available law
19:09 Re: allocation on the stack Thomas van Gulick
19:08 Big object allocation problem Thomas van Gulick
18:06 Re: -fno-exceptions and bad_alloc Jason Merrill
18:06 Re: Questions about cpp, cpplib, and precompiled headers Jason Merrill
18:00 Re: -fno-exceptions and bad_alloc Mike Stump
17:58 Re: allocation on the stack Mike Stump
17:18 -fno-exceptions and bad_alloc Thomas van Gulick
17:14 allocation on the stack Thomas van Gulick
16:46 Re: question about constant-folding compares... Richard Henderson
16:02 unsuscribe Jean Magny
14:48 Questions about cpp, cpplib, and precompiled headers Doug Landauer
13:32 binutils 2.9.5.0.14 is released. H.J. Lu
12:06 Re: STL support in gdb Jason Merrill
10:20 Re: lazy execution optimization Jeffrey A Law
09:11 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Hartmut Schirmer
08:43 question about constant-folding compares... Alan Lehotsky
08:32 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
06:56 Re: type based aliasing again Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
06:53 STL support in gdb Rainer Dorsch
02:15 Re: lazy execution optimization Sylvain Pion

September 26, 1999
15:24 undefined reference to `__setbits' Peter Gerwinski
15:15 Re: lazy execution optimization Steven W. Orr
14:45 Re: i386: symbolic_operand args unused? Robert Lipe
14:13 Re: i386: symbolic_operand args unused? Richard Henderson
09:30 lazy execution optimization Sylvain Pion
08:06 i386: symbolic_operand args unused? Robert Lipe
06:28 unroll.c (copy_loop_body): splittable_regs[src_regno] with src_regno == -1 - BWAM ! Toon Moene

September 25, 1999
14:10 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Zack Weinberg
13:47 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Zack Weinberg
12:12 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Jeffrey A Law
01:00 Re: gcc for Solaris X86 2.5 Haydee Y. Ching

September 24, 1999
23:37 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
20:35 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
18:26 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Joe Buck
17:28 Bug? Global offset table register not preserved Andrew Clausen
15:20 Re: memory manager Mike Stump
14:48 memory manager Alexandre Mancini
13:51 Re: GCC for Unix and Xenix Robert Lipe
13:40 GCC for Unix and Xenix Intervel Informática
13:10 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Gerald Pfeifer
10:33 Re: gcc for Solaris X86 2.5 Gerald Pfeifer
08:06 snapshot problems Dean Wilson
07:56 snapshot problems Dean Wilson
07:11 gcc for Solaris X86 2.5 John Lopez
06:47 Re: Forest through the Trees Mark Klein
04:35 Re: Autoincrement examples Michael Hayes
02:59 Re: Forest through the Trees Richard Earnshaw
01:01 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
00:36 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Andreas Schwab

September 23, 1999
20:23 Re: danger: Global Null Pointer Test Elimination Geoff Keating
17:51 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Zack Weinberg
17:47 Re: Is this a bug? Dynamic cast error similar to thunk error. Mike Stump
17:32 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
17:09 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Joe Buck
16:22 Re: Processor information Jamie Lokier
16:05 Re: Is this a bug? Dynamic cast error similar to thunk error. Jason Merrill
15:58 Re: Is this a bug? Dynamic cast error similar to thunk error. Martin v. Loewis
15:57 Re: Is this a bug? Dynamic cast error similar to thunk error. Mike Stump
15:09 Re: Is this a bug? Dynamic cast error similar to thunk error. Jason Merrill
14:41 What so special about i386's bx? Andrew Clausen
14:33 Re: Is this a bug? Dynamic cast error similar to thunk error. Martin v. Loewis
14:26 Re: Forest through the Trees Mark Klein
14:07 Re: Forest through the Trees Jeffrey A Law
14:07 Re: Forest through the Trees Mark Klein
13:39 Re: Forest through the Trees Richard Earnshaw
13:31 Forest through the Trees Mark Klein
12:13 Re: Manuals for GCC/G++ Martin v. Loewis
12:03 HPUX, PA-RISC based __builtins bugs John W. Stevens
11:48 Re: Resuming a compile Mike Stump
11:39 Re: gcc/dynlinker bug on solaris 2.7 Bruno Haible
11:06 Re: type based aliasing again craig
10:41 Trouble inlining functions. Deephanphongs, David
10:12 Speed under gcc/glibc2 vs gcc/glibc1 David Ronis
10:08 Re: Processor information David Edelsohn
09:23 Re: Processor information Dan Nicolaescu
09:13 Re: Pending Projects Bruce Korb
09:06 Re: type based aliasing again John W. Stevens
09:05 Re: willing to assist Martin v. Loewis
08:56 Manuals for GCC/G++ Roberto Zegarra Dorado
08:56 Re: willing to assist David Starner
08:51 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
08:47 Re: danger: Global Null Pointer Test Elimination Roman Belenov
08:23 danger: Global Null Pointer Test Elimination veksler
07:14 willing to assist Joachim Nadler
06:15 Re: Processor information Richard Earnshaw
06:04 Re: Processor information Jeffrey A Law
05:44 Re: Processor information Richard Earnshaw
05:35 Re: Processor information Steinar Bang
05:29 Re: Processor information Steinar Bang
05:28 Re: Processor information Steinar Bang
05:22 Re: Processor information Richard Earnshaw
05:08 Re: Processor information Nick Clifton
05:01 Re: Processor information Martin v. Loewis
04:37 Re: Autoincrement examples Michael Hayes
02:53 Re: Processor information Richard Earnshaw
01:50 Re: Autoincrement examples Bernd Schmidt
01:28 Re: Processor information Martin v. Loewis
01:27 Re: vma space for gc Andreas Schwab
01:17 Re: vma space for gc Mark Mitchell
01:07 why large program size HOWARD LEW
00:54 Re: vma space for gc Richard Henderson
00:49 Re: vma space for gc Andreas Schwab

September 22, 1999
23:23 Re: Autoincrement examples Michael Hayes
20:41 gcc/dynlinker bug on solaris 2.7 Marat Boshernitsan
19:48 Re: Processor information Mike Stump
19:33 vma space for gc Richard Henderson
19:13 A simple C question? Steven W. Orr
18:06 binutils 2.9.5.0.13 is released. H.J. Lu
16:29 Re: egcs and altivec vector type Mike Stump
16:03 Re: Resuming a compile Jeffrey A Law
15:54 Resuming a compile David Starner
15:29 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Alex Buell
14:40 Re: Processor information Horst von Brand
13:08 Re: type based aliasing again Harvey J. Stein
12:40 Re: Processor information Gerald Pfeifer
12:31 Re: Autoincrement examples Denis Chertykov
12:15 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
11:54 Re: Processor information James L. Dein
11:23 Re: where did ioperm & iopl functions go ? Gerald Pfeifer
11:14 Re: where did ioperm & iopl functions go ? Jamie Lokier
11:03 Re[2]: where did ioperm & iopl functions go ? Roman Belenov
10:39 Processor information Martin v. Loewis
10:37 Re: where did ioperm & iopl functions go ? Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
08:42 Re: __builtin_return_address why const parameter ? Andreas Schwab
07:51 __builtin_return_address why const parameter ? Ulrich Lauther
07:37 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
07:20 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Jeffrey A Law
07:14 Re: egcs and altivec vector type Gerald Pfeifer
07:09 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
07:09 Re: egcs and altivec vector type David Young
07:02 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Franz Sirl
06:54 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Jeffrey A Law
06:44 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Nick Ing-Simmons
06:38 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Franz Sirl
06:17 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Marc Espie
06:13 Re: Processor information document Marc Espie
05:22 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Jeffrey A Law
05:00 Re: Autoincrement examples Michael Hayes
04:57 Re: Autoincrement examples Michael Hayes
04:40 Is this a bug? Continuation.... Fredrik Öhrström
04:39 Re: Autoincrement examples Bernd Schmidt
04:36 Re: gcc-ss-19990920 is now available Alexandre Oliva
04:32 Re: Autoincrement examples Michael Hayes
04:25 Is this a bug? Dynamic cast error similar to thunk error. Fredrik Öhrström
03:21 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
03:09 Autoincrement examples Bernd Schmidt
01:09 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Wolfram Gloger
00:37 Re: alloca "bug" on x86? Nick Ing-Simmons

September 21, 1999
20:37 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
18:45 Re: libf2c Christopher R. Jones
18:18 Re: libf2c N8TM
17:57 2.95.1 adam prime
16:15 Re: type based aliasing again craig
15:47 Re: type based aliasing again John W. Stevens
14:03 Re: Processor information document Jeffrey A Law
13:53 Processor information document Martin v. Loewis
12:16 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Alex Buell
11:51 Re: alloca "bug" on x86? Kaveh R. Ghazi
11:27 Template Specialization Casey Carter
10:41 RE: gcc/egcs 64bit pointers under HP-UX11 PA-RISC2.0 Heribert Dahms
10:24 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Jeffrey A Law
10:14 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
10:10 Re: egcs and altivec vector type David Edelsohn
10:08 Re: gcc/egcs 64bit pointers under HP-UX11 PA-RISC2.0 Jeffrey A Law
09:56 gcc/egcs 64bit pointers under HP-UX11 PA-RISC2.0 Heribert Dahms
08:50 Re: type based aliasing again Harvey J. Stein
08:48 Re: type based aliasing again Harvey J. Stein
08:06 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Mark Mitchell
07:33 Re: bitset and CHAR_BIT Martin v. Loewis
06:53 Re: libf2c Christopher R. Jones
06:33 The USER_H issue Marc Espie
06:06 Re: alloca "bug" on x86? Dima Volodin
05:54 Re: alloca "bug" on x86? Jeffrey A Law
05:36 Re: alloca "bug" on x86? Nick Ing-Simmons
05:31 Re: HP-UX 10.20 trouble John_W_Cosgrove
05:24 alloca "bug" on x86? Nick Ing-Simmons
05:11 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Matthias Urlichs
03:49 AW: AW: Why are there so many bytes allocated on stack ? Rotter Klaus
03:47 Re: C++ coding standards (was: [C++] PATCH to reduce code replication in error.c) gdr
03:26 Trouble with templates and gcc-2.95 Jari Karppinen
03:26 bitset and CHAR_BIT Rainer Dorsch
03:25 Re: C++ coding standards (was: [C++] PATCH to reduce code replication in error.c) Nathan Sidwell
03:15 Re: where did ioperm & iopl functions go ? Jamie Lokier
03:14 Re: AW: Why are there so many bytes allocated on stack ? Jeffrey A Law
02:33 Re: block merging Jeffrey A Law
02:33 Re: Gcc-2.95.1 and LessTif (solved!) Terry Barnaby
02:16 Re: where did ioperm & iopl functions go ? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
02:15 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Jeffrey A Law
02:13 Re: gcc-ss-19990920 is now available Jeffrey A Law
02:07 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Jeffrey A Law
02:02 Re: type based aliasing again Jamie Lokier
01:26 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Wolfram Gloger
01:16 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
01:16 Re: type based aliasing again Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
01:16 Re: Why are there so many bytes allocated on stack ? Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
00:56 AW: Why are there so many bytes allocated on stack ? Rotter Klaus
00:48 Re: gcc/cp/parse.c cannot be checked in Mark Mitchell
00:44 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Mark Mitchell
00:37 Re: C++ coding standards (was: [C++] PATCH to reduce codereplication in error.c) Mark Mitchell
00:31 Re: C++ coding standards (was: [C++] PATCH to reduce code replication in error.c) Jason Merrill
00:06 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Jason Merrill
00:00 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Alex Buell

September 20, 1999
21:10 Re: gcc/cp/parse.c cannot be checked in Alexandre Oliva
20:38 gcc/cp/parse.c cannot be checked in Alexandre Oliva
19:06 Re: gcc-ss-19990920 is now available Alexandre Oliva
18:50 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Alexandre Oliva
18:23 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Richard Henderson
18:20 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Alexandre Oliva
18:19 Re: HP-UX 10.20 trouble Alexandre Oliva
18:18 Re: Problem compiling Xemacs with -O3 Alexandre Oliva
18:12 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Richard Henderson
17:34 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Alexandre Oliva
16:33 Problem compiling Xemacs with -O3 Dara Hazeghi
16:20 Re: CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Gerald Pfeifer
15:59 CVS problem with gcc/cp/ChangeLog Martin v. Loewis
15:46 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Martin v. Loewis
15:42 Re: Left shift operations and the long long int datatype Alex Buell
15:37 Re: Left shift operations and the long long int datatype Jamie Lokier
15:37 Re: Why are there so many bytes allocated on stack ? Martin v. Loewis
15:28 Re: C++ coding standards (was: [C++] PATCH to reduce code replication in error.c) gdr
15:23 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Martin v. Loewis
15:17 Re: type based aliasing again John W. Stevens
15:16 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Alex Buell
15:13 Re: type based aliasing - summary Richard Stallman
15:04 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Martin v. Loewis
15:03 Left shift operations and the long long int datatype Alex Buell
14:17 Re: ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Alex Buell
14:11 C++ coding standards (was: [C++] PATCH to reduce code replication in error.c) Jason Merrill
14:10 ABI/compatibility details? (egcs -> gcc 2.95 -> future?) Doug Landauer
13:43 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Mike Stump
12:00 HP-UX 10.20 trouble John_W_Cosgrove
11:49 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Chris G. Demetriou
11:39 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Horst von Brand
11:20 egcs and altivec vector type David Young
11:02 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Zack Weinberg
10:38 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Richard Earnshaw
10:17 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Zack Weinberg
09:55 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
09:26 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Zack Weinberg
09:02 Re: Function return problem David Starner
08:58 Re: Function return problem Alexandre Oliva
08:38 libf2c Christopher R. Jones
08:26 Function return problem Steve Grubb
08:22 gcc-ss-19990920 is now available law
07:48 Why are there so many bytes allocated on stack ? Rotter Klaus
05:57 Re: redefinition of `class exception' Rainer Dorsch
05:54 Re: type based aliasing again Joern Rennecke
05:43 redefinition of `class exception' Rainer Dorsch
04:42 Re: bitmap_debug - prototype without declaration Jeffrey A Law
04:34 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
04:20 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
04:03 Re: adding iso646.h back Jeffrey A Law
03:58 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
03:13 Re: The complex problems Greg McGary
03:07 Re: Inyone know what inadru is? Nick Ing-Simmons
02:46 Re: Inyone know what inadru is? Nick Ing-Simmons
01:10 Re: Singletons and optimisation Martin v. Loewis
00:34 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab
00:15 __builtin_return_address and stacktraces on Alpha Martin Kahlert

September 19, 1999
15:08 cannot exec 'mips-tfile': No such file or directory Dante Profeta
13:54 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
13:54 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Richard Stallman
10:14 Singletons and optimisation Carlo Wood
10:11 re: failed compilation under Solaris 2.6 Gerald Pfeifer
08:52 Re: Can I get one file through cvs ? Martin v. Loewis
06:19 where did ioperm & iopl functions go ? Ahmed El-Mahmoudy
06:07 Re: Can I get one file through cvs ? Gerald Pfeifer
04:33 Can I get one file through cvs ? Denis Chertykov
03:02 g77 -c bla.f crashes with SIGSEGV using recently CVS'd mainline. Toon Moene
02:16 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Richard Henderson

September 18, 1999
22:18 Re: type based aliasing again Ross Morgan-Linial
18:42 Re: Inyone know what inadru is? Steven W. Orr
18:40 Re: on vacation till 1999-04-10 Tkil
13:52 Re: on vacation till 1999-04-10 craig
13:27 Re: on vacation till 1999-04-10 Marc Lehmann
11:54 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Mike Stump
11:29 Re: type based aliasing again Russ Allbery
11:20 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Zack Weinberg
10:51 Re: on vacation till 1999-04-10 Alex Buell
10:44 Re: on vacation till 1999-04-10 Daniel Jacobowitz
10:38 Re: on vacation till 1999-04-10 Alexandre Oliva
10:24 Re: The complex problems Michael Meissner
10:22 Re: The complex problems Michael Meissner
10:22 Re: on vacation till 1999-04-10 craig
10:18 type based aliasing - summary Marc Lehmann
10:17 on vacation till 1999-04-10 Marc Lehmann
08:33 Re: type based aliasing again N8TM
07:30 Re: type based aliasing again Stephen L Moshier
07:11 Re: The complex problems Stephen L Moshier
05:14 Re: gcc_tooldir is useless Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
05:05 Re: exceptions and shared libraries Martin v. Loewis
04:50 Re: GNU compiler Martin v. Loewis
04:50 Re: Inyone know what inadru is? Martin v. Loewis
03:52 Re: The complex problems Toon Moene
03:25 Re: type based aliasing again Artem Hodyush
02:51 Re: type based aliasing again Ross Morgan-Linial

September 17, 1999
23:21 Re: The complex problems Jeffrey A Law
23:20 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Jeffrey A Law
23:19 Re: The complex problems Jeffrey A Law
22:55 Re: The complex problems Greg McGary
22:46 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Zack Weinberg
22:29 Re: The complex problems Greg McGary
22:16 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
22:16 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
20:37 Re: The complex problems Michael Meissner
19:00 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Mike Stump
18:54 Re: The complex problems Greg McGary
18:50 EBIZ = 1,2,3...4 CASH FindYourGame
15:33 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Joern Rennecke
15:25 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Mike Stump
15:09 RE: c++ warning idea paulf
14:58 Re: c++ warning idea Alexandre Oliva
13:59 c++ warning idea paulf
13:55 Inyone know what inadru is? Steven W Orr
12:59 Location of dsp16xx binutils? Jeff Garzik
09:33 exceptions and shared libraries Kevin Van Horn
09:28 Re: RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Jeffrey A Law
09:02 Re: type based aliasing again Harvey J. Stein
08:32 Re: __typealias qualifier (was Re: type based aliasing again) Mark Mitchell
07:07 __typealias qualifier (was Re: type based aliasing again) Patrick J. LoPresti
06:21 Re: Strange output from g++/gcc (S.u.S.E 6.2) Evguenii SMOGAILOV
05:57 Re: Strange output from g++/gcc (S.u.S.E 6.2) Laurent Bonnaud
01:51 Re: type based aliasing again craig
01:20 RMS's aliasing suggestion appears unimplementable Zack Weinberg
00:26 gcc_tooldir is useless Andreas Schwab

September 16, 1999
23:41 Re: I need a GCC porting hint (or two) for an odd architecture... Jeffrey A Law
23:38 Re: type based aliasing again Gabriel Dos_Reis
23:15 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:14 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:13 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:13 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
22:19 Re: type based aliasing again Andi Kleen
18:33 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Jason Merrill
18:00 STL allocators thread safe? Chris McKay
17:16 Gcc-2.95.1 and LessTif (solved!) Alex Buell
17:15 Re: -MD behavior does not match documentation Tom Tromey
15:57 GNU compiler Steve
15:21 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
15:05 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mike Stump
14:48 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Richard Henderson
14:45 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
14:33 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Jason Merrill
14:29 Re: type based aliasing again craig
14:29 Re: type based aliasing again craig
14:28 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] craig
14:28 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" craig
14:22 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
14:17 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Richard Henderson
14:16 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Joern Rennecke
13:59 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Richard Henderson
13:58 Re: -MD behavior does not match documentation Jamie Lokier
13:55 Re: why are these alias sets different? Jamie Lokier
13:54 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
13:36 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Marc Espie
13:24 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mike Stump
13:13 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Mike Stump
13:02 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
12:42 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Mike Stump
12:36 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Zack Weinberg
12:36 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Zack Weinberg
12:36 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Zack Weinberg
12:36 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Zack Weinberg
12:18 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
12:08 Re: type based aliasing again Joern Rennecke
11:48 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
11:45 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
11:42 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Jason Merrill
11:23 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Jason Merrill
10:54 Re: type based aliasing again Andi Kleen
10:37 Re: Almost got glibc working with no-vtable-thunks, but .... Martin v. Loewis
10:31 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Alexandre Oliva
10:17 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] David Edelsohn
10:10 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] Mark Mitchell
09:48 Re: aliasing warnings [patch] David Starner
09:35 aliasing warnings [patch] Zack Weinberg
09:34 Re: I need a GCC porting hint (or two) for an odd architecture... Nick Ing-Simmons
09:01 Installed gcc 2.95.1 on HP PA 1.1 system running HP-UX 11.00. Dave Jasa
08:46 I need a GCC porting hint (or two) for an odd architecture... Andrew Webber
08:24 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" David_Abrahams
08:16 Re: -MD behavior does not match documentation I Lee Hetherington
08:09 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Mark Mitchell
08:03 Re: -MD behavior does not match documentation Richard Hadsell
07:55 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
07:41 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Marc Espie
07:24 -MD behavior does not match documentation I Lee Hetherington
06:57 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
06:12 Re: type based aliasing again Artem Hodyush
03:50 Re: Almost got glibc working with no-vtable-thunks, but .... Fredrik Öhrström
02:19 Re: type based aliasing again craig
02:18 Re: type based aliasing again craig
02:18 [mjbedy@mtu.edu: Re: type based aliasing again] craig
02:15 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Alexandre Oliva
01:46 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Marc Espie
01:32 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Marc Espie
00:58 Re: why are these alias sets different? Nick Ing-Simmons
00:50 Re: obstacks live on? Jeffrey A Law

September 15, 1999
23:15 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" N8TM
23:15 Re: obstacks live on? Mark Mitchell
23:14 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:14 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
21:56 obstacks live on? Paul Burchard
21:47 Re: type based aliasing again Florin Mateoc
21:36 Re: why are these alias sets different? Mark Mitchell
21:15 Re: why are these alias sets different? Zack Weinberg
21:01 Re: why are these alias sets different? Mark Mitchell
20:48 Re: why are these alias sets different? Zack Weinberg
19:17 Re: why are these alias sets different? Mark Mitchell
19:07 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Mike Stump
18:57 why are these alias sets different? Zack Weinberg
18:41 Writing a decompiler using RTL Lynn Winebarger
17:32 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Ross Smith
17:16 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Mark Mitchell
17:10 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
16:55 Re: Which download for a C compiler Alexandre Oliva
16:52 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Michael Meissner
16:49 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Mark Mitchell
16:42 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Mark Mitchell
16:17 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Ross Morgan-Linial
15:58 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Ross Morgan-Linial
15:45 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Mark Mitchell
15:33 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
15:24 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" craig
15:22 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" craig
15:20 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" David Edelsohn
15:11 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Ross Morgan-Linial
15:05 Re: Almost got glibc working with no-vtable-thunks, but .... Martin v. Loewis
15:01 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Mark Mitchell
14:58 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Ross Morgan-Linial
14:37 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" craig
14:32 Re: type based aliasing again craig
14:32 Re: type based aliasing again craig
14:26 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Bruce Korb
14:07 Re: type based aliasing again - meaning of "undefined" Ross Morgan-Linial
13:38 Re: GCC Brian Ford
13:34 GCC dmitry milman cis stnt
13:22 Gcc-2.95.1 and LessTif Alex Buell
12:45 bitmap_debug - prototype without declaration Denis Chertykov
11:45 Re: GCC C++ 2.95.1 Mike Stump
11:42 re: type based aliasing again Michael J. Bedy
10:48 Re: type based aliasing again Nick Ing-Simmons
10:24 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 David O'Brien
10:08 Re: type based aliasing again craig
10:02 Re: type based aliasing again craig
10:01 Re: type based aliasing again craig
09:59 Re: type based aliasing again Nick Ing-Simmons
09:56 Re: type based aliasing again Nick Ing-Simmons
09:31 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
09:23 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Zack Weinberg
09:20 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
09:19 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
09:06 Almost got glibc working with no-vtable-thunks, but .... Fredrik Öhrström
08:57 Re: type based aliasing again Nathan Sidwell
08:32 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
08:28 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Lehmann
08:28 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Lehmann
08:27 Re: type based aliasing again Kaveh R. Ghazi
08:26 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
08:02 Re: type based aliasing again Nick Ing-Simmons
07:55 Re: type based aliasing again Nick Ing-Simmons
07:47 Re: type based aliasing again Nick Ing-Simmons
07:42 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Wes Morgan
07:02 Re: type based aliasing again David Ronis
03:53 new mirror in Turkey ... Erhan Bilgili
03:52 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Andreas Schwab
03:11 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 David O'Brien
02:52 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
02:47 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
02:33 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
02:25 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 David O'Brien
02:23 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Andreas Schwab
02:09 Re: EGCSTENSIONS PATCH for 2.95.1 for using SUN make with builddir != srcdir Jeffrey A Law
02:07 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
02:07 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
02:06 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
02:06 Re: Post reload copy propagation? Jeffrey A Law
02:05 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
02:05 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
02:05 Re: odd things in md files Jeffrey A Law
02:02 Re: [dax@gurulabs.com: PATCH: `__norestrict' type qualifier (fwd)] Jeffrey A Law
02:01 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
02:00 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
02:00 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
01:59 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Jeffrey A Law
01:59 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Espie
01:40 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 David O'Brien
01:21 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Andreas Schwab
01:17 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 David O'Brien
00:56 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 David O'Brien
00:25 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Zack Weinberg
00:05 Re: About log() in GCC Martin Kahlert
00:03 Re: About log() in GCC Jean-Pierre Radley

September 14, 1999
23:55 About log() in GCC JN_Lin
23:46 Re: type based aliasing again Geoff Keating
23:41 Re: type based aliasing again craig
23:14 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 David O'Brien
23:00 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Zack Weinberg
22:55 Re: GCC C++ 2.95.1 Martin Kahlert
22:34 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Loren James Rittle
22:22 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
22:20 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
20:08 Re: FreeBSD 4.0 Richard Henderson
19:50 GCC C++ 2.95.1 Lucas
19:32 FreeBSD 4.0 Wes Morgan
17:44 Re: General Optimization questions Marc Lehmann
17:39 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Lehmann
17:38 Re: type based aliasing again Michael Meissner
17:35 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Lehmann
17:23 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Lehmann
17:22 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Lehmann
17:00 Re: ANSI incompatability in gcc stdio.h Zack Weinberg
16:43 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
16:19 Re: type based aliasing again Dima Volodin
16:15 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
16:01 Re: type based aliasing again Toon Moene
15:23 Which download for a C compiler Jason G. Key
15:08 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
15:06 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
15:00 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
14:48 Re: type based aliasing again Toon Moene
14:44 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
14:29 re: failed compilation under Solaris 2.6 Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
14:08 Re: Troubles with -fno-vtable-thunks recompilation.... Was: Strange C++ behaviour Martin v. Loewis
12:43 Re: is this an objective-c egcs forum? Ovidiu Predescu
12:01 bootstrap failure, egcs-1990913, OSF/1 version 3.2D kargl
11:58 Re: type based aliasing again Gerald Pfeifer
11:39 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
11:14 Re: type based aliasing again craig
11:11 Re: type based aliasing again craig
11:10 is this an objective-c egcs forum? David Young
11:01 Re: type based aliasing again craig
10:52 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
10:31 Re: type based aliasing again Nick Ing-Simmons
10:10 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Earnshaw
09:57 Re: Installing gcc whithout having C compilator David Edelsohn
09:56 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
09:31 Re: type based aliasing again Andi Kleen
08:45 Re: type based aliasing again Jamie Lokier
08:38 Re: [dax@gurulabs.com: PATCH: `__norestrict' type qualifier (fwd)] Jamie Lokier
08:34 Re: [dax@gurulabs.com: PATCH: `__norestrict' type qualifier (fwd)] Patrick J. LoPresti
08:15 re: failed compilation under Solaris 2.6 James Black
07:39 Re: Windows Keith Duthie
07:36 Can't resolve symbol '__register_frame_info' David Ronis
07:29 Big increase in testsuite failures in 19990913 David Ronis
07:14 Re: type based aliasing again Marcel Cox
07:07 Re: MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Andre McCurdy
06:50 Re: type based aliasing again Bernd Schmidt
06:50 The steps of cross compiler, is it right? pschen
06:46 Re: type based aliasing again Marcel Cox
06:36 Troubles with -fno-vtable-thunks recompilation.... Was: Strange C++ behaviour Fredrik Öhrström
06:28 Windows MontyBloom
05:52 Re: type based aliasing again Bernd Schmidt
05:45 Re: type based aliasing again Alexandre Oliva
05:34 Re: type based aliasing again Bernd Schmidt
04:01 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Espie
03:51 Re: vacation and strict aliasing Marc Espie
03:04 Re: type based aliasing again Alexandre Oliva
02:51 Re: Installing gcc whithout having C compilator Alexandre Oliva
02:45 Installing gcc whithout having C compilator ben
02:45 Re: type based aliasing again -- a suggestion from a user Marcel Cox

September 13, 1999
21:45 Re: type based aliasing again N8TM
21:34 Re: Optimization for PII Jeff Garzik
21:02 Re: Optimization for PII Richard Henderson
20:47 Re: General Optimization questions Mike Stump
20:31 General Optimization questions Dara Hazeghi
17:21 Re: Optimization for PII Mike Stump
16:43 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Joern Rennecke
16:34 Re: type based aliasing again Mike Stump
15:36 Re: odd things in md files Richard Henderson
15:21 Re: odd things in md files Zack Weinberg
14:46 Re: odd things in md files Richard Henderson
13:22 Re: type based aliasing again craig
13:16 re: bootstrap with -fnew-abi? bkoz
13:08 Re: question about preprocessor directives in macro calls Zack Weinberg
13:00 Re: Optimization for PII Marc Lehmann
13:00 Re: vacation and strict aliasing Marc Lehmann
12:47 question about preprocessor directives in macro calls martin.kahlert
12:36 Re: odd things in md files Zack Weinberg
12:32 Re: MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Jim Wilson
12:01 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Richard Henderson
10:55 Re: type based aliasing again R. Kelley Cook
10:31 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Joern Rennecke
10:12 Re: type based aliasing again -- a suggestion from a user George T. Talbot
09:51 Re: type based aliasing again -- a suggestion from a user Mark Mitchell
09:28 Re: type based aliasing again -- a suggestion from a user George T. Talbot
08:52 Re: GCC and NT DDK - still problems Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
08:52 Re: MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
08:51 Re: type based aliasing again -- a suggestion from a user Mark Mitchell
08:43 Re: gnu c compiler David Edelsohn
08:26 egcs-ss-19990913 is now available law
08:10 bootstrap with -fnew-abi? Konstantin Baumann
07:36 Re: type based aliasing again -- a suggestion from a user George T. Talbot
07:28 Problems with GNU linker Engelbert Staller
05:53 Re: MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Andre McCurdy
04:40 AW: GCC and NT DDK - still problems Rotter Klaus
04:05 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Earnshaw
03:29 Re: vacation and strict aliasing Russ Allbery
02:35 Optimization for PII Rainer Dorsch
01:10 tree types of parser tokens Paul Burchard
00:47 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:47 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:47 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:40 GCC and NT DDK - still problems Pavel Pisa;research student
00:10 Re: c++ compiler Gerald Pfeifer

September 12, 1999
22:03 Re: Binutils Alex Buell
18:30 c++ compiler BPalencia
17:59 Re: EGCSTENSIONS PATCH for 2.95.1 for using SUN make with builddir != srcdir Marc Lehmann
17:59 Re: vacation and strict aliasing Marc Lehmann
16:48 Make 10K A Month, Famous Private-Eye Tells All lopt
16:10 Binutils Bruce M Beach
14:27 Have You Ever Considered ? wethankyou
12:29 Re: [dax@gurulabs.com: PATCH: `__norestrict' type qualifier (fwd)] Jamie Lokier
11:20 Re: type based aliasing again Josh Stern
09:45 Re: type based aliasing again Jonathan Larmour
08:54 Re: type based aliasing again craig
08:16 Re: type based aliasing again Robert Lipe
04:02 Post reload copy propagation? Michael Hayes
00:56 Re: odd things in md files Richard Henderson
00:52 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:51 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:51 [dax@gurulabs.com: PATCH: `__norestrict' type qualifier (fwd)] Richard Stallman
00:49 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:18 Re: odd things in md files Zack Weinberg

September 11, 1999
23:40 Re: type based aliasing again Sudish Joseph
23:19 Re: odd things in md files Richard Henderson
21:53 Re: g77/686 performance regressions from gcc-2.95.1 to gcc-2.96 N8TM
21:48 Re: type based aliasing again N8TM
21:15 odd things in md files Zack Weinberg
20:14 #1recipe line mstephe93
19:01 Re: g77/686 performance regressions from gcc-2.95.1 to gcc-2.96 H.J. Lu
18:21 Re: type based aliasing again Phil Edwards
18:20 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
18:04 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
17:43 Re: g77/686 performance regressions from gcc-2.95.1 to gcc-2.96 Richard Henderson
16:11 Re: MMX regs and GCC Marc Lehmann
15:29 Re: EGCSTENSIONS PATCH for 2.95.1 for using SUN make with builddir!= srcdir Gerald Pfeifer
15:20 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
15:16 g77/686 performance regressions from gcc-2.95.1 to gcc-2.96 N8TM
15:14 Re: EGCSTENSIONS PATCH for 2.95.1 for using SUN make with builddir!= srcdir craig
14:59 Re: EGCSTENSIONS PATCH for 2.95.1 for using SUN make with builddir!= srcdir Gerald Pfeifer
14:58 Netlib f2c and related work craig
03:51 Re: type based aliasing again craig
03:50 Re: type based aliasing again craig
00:17 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:17 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:17 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:16 Re: vacation and strict aliasing Richard Stallman
00:16 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:15 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:15 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
00:14 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman

September 10, 1999
23:44 Have You Ever Considered ? wethankyou
22:08 Re: GCC 2.95.1 static string won't compile on SCO-OSR5 Robert Lipe
18:25 Re: type based aliasing again Jonathan Larmour
16:12 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Richard Henderson
16:07 binutils 2.9.5.0.12 is released. H.J. Lu
15:33 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Artur Skawina
14:29 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Lehmann
13:47 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Martin v. Loewis
12:29 Re: type based aliasing again Sudish Joseph
12:20 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Richard Henderson
11:57 Re: MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Jim Wilson
08:57 An alternative type alias warning Jamie Lokier
08:45 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Jamie Lokier
08:43 Re: type based aliasing again craig
08:43 Re: type based aliasing again craig
08:42 Re: type based aliasing again craig
08:33 gcc for sparc64 on sun solaris2.7 Christian Orsatti
08:24 Re: MMX regs and GCC Jamie Lokier
08:21 Re: MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Andre McCurdy
08:00 Re: gcc for HP-UX 11.00 Brian Ford
02:26 gcc for HP-UX 11.00 erik.de.smet
00:23 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
00:13 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
00:11 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
00:06 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
00:03 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell

September 09, 1999
23:57 gcc for sparc64 on sun solaris2.7 Christian Orsatti
23:38 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
23:26 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:25 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:25 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:25 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:25 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:25 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
23:25 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Stallman
21:54 Re: type based aliasing again Alex Rosenberg
20:35 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
20:16 Re: Time to shut up (was: Re: type based aliasing) Jeffrey A Law
19:48 Re: GCC 2.95.1 static string won't compile on SCO-OSR5 + +
18:23 Time to shut up (was: Re: type based aliasing) Claus Fischer
17:56 vacation and strict aliasing Joe Buck
17:31 Re: type based aliasing again Claus Fischer
17:15 Re: type based aliasing again Claus Fischer
17:12 Re: type based aliasing again John Vickers
17:04 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
16:55 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
16:51 Re: type based aliasing again John Vickers
16:37 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
16:24 Re: type based aliasing again Claus Fischer
15:57 Re: type based aliasing again David Starner
15:40 type based aliasing again Claus Fischer
15:26 Y2K Update Notification BDS
14:42 Re: MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Richard Henderson
14:39 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Artur Skawina
14:38 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
14:26 Re: type based aliasing again Mike Stump
12:45 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
12:18 FW: Template code is 6.4 times slower than hand-written code Jan Reimers
11:51 Re: type based aliasing again craig
11:44 What's Next for G77 craig
11:37 ix86 backend: opportunities for optimizations ? ¨Marcel Cox
10:57 Re: cross-compiler problem with "gcc-2.8.1" :( Joe Buck
10:55 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
10:51 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
10:48 Re: cross-compiler problem with "gcc-2.8.1" :( Brian Ford
10:43 linking egcs code on the DEC Steve Kettle
10:36 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
10:33 cross-compiler problem with "gcc-2.8.1" :( Peter Nygren
10:25 file://localhost/extr/lang/egcs/releases/index.html master
09:28 Re: New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...) Per Bothner
09:13 Access Denied!!!!! P.Willmington
08:12 Re: GCC 2.95.1 static string won't compile on SCO-OSR5 Robert Lipe
07:58 Re: type based aliasing again craig
07:12 Re: type based aliasing again Marc Espie
07:06 Re: MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Andre McCurdy
06:50 Suboptimal code (gcc 2.95.1, i386-unknown-openbsd) Marc Espie
03:45 Re: Peephole2 as a generic RTL rewriter Bernd Schmidt
02:45 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
02:20 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
02:08 Re: type based aliasing again Jeffrey A Law
01:47 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Martin v. Loewis
01:39 Re: New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...) Martin v. Loewis
01:38 Re: type based aliasing again Martin v. Loewis
01:09 Re: Peephole2 as a generic RTL rewriter Michael Hayes
00:57 Re: Peephole2 as a generic RTL rewriter Richard Henderson
00:42 Peephole2 as a generic RTL rewriter Michael Hayes
00:31 misleading documentation for Installing GCC Dietmar P. Schindler

September 08, 1999
23:51 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
23:44 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Henderson
23:41 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
23:27 GCC 2.95.1 static string won't compile on SCO-OSR5 + +
23:20 Re: type based aliasing again Richard Henderson
22:25 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
22:04 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
21:56 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
21:45 m68k-coff cross-compiler support -fPIC? pschen
21:45 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
21:33 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
20:44 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
20:43 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
20:31 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
20:26 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
20:04 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
19:51 Re: type based aliasing again David Edelsohn
19:44 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
19:35 Re: what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Joe Buck
19:31 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
19:25 Re: type based aliasing again Joe Buck
19:21 what's required for builtin_memcpy to be inlined Artur Skawina
19:13 Re: type based aliasing again Mike Stump
18:43 Re: type based aliasing again Mark Mitchell
18:11 type based aliasing again Joe Buck
16:59 Re: gcc-2.95.2 rough plan Jeffrey A Law
16:23 RE: gcc-2.95.2 rough plan Billinghurst, David (RTD)
15:30 Re: egcs-ss-19990907 is now available Daniel Jacobowitz
15:21 Re: egcs-ss-19990907 is now available Alex Buell
15:06 Re: egcs-ss-19990907 is now available Nix
14:39 Re: Strange strings in GCC compiled code Mumit Khan
14:17 Re: libiberty legal status ? Mike Stump
14:05 Re: MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Jeffrey A Law
14:01 Re: Perhaps useful information about optimisation David Edelsohn
13:50 Re: MMX regs and GCC Jeff Garzik
13:44 Re: Should we create an attribute malloc for supposed alias benefits? Mark Mitchell
13:42 Re: MMX regs and GCC Ben Combee
13:32 Re: Strange strings in GCC compiled code Nimar Arora
13:30 Re: MMX regs and GCC Jeff Garzik
13:27 Re: Should we create an attribute malloc for supposed alias benefits? Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:55 Errors Compiling glibc-2.1.2 J. Daniel Powell
12:55 Template code is 6.4 times slower than hand-written code Paul Stodghill
11:33 MIPS16 -mentry pseudo instruction definitions Andre McCurdy
09:52 Gateway test (N/T) Bruce Korb
09:33 Re: GCC 2.95.x: Major problems on Solaris (was: Lost specific.htmlFAQEntry) Gerald Pfeifer
09:23 Re: C++ Compiler Joe Buck
09:02 Re: gcc-2.95.2 rough plan Joel Klecker
07:38 gcc 2.95.1 successful build Himanshu J. Gohel
06:37 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
06:35 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
06:33 Re: New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...) Per Bothner
06:03 Re: egcs-ss-19990907 : bug in gcc/configure ? Alexandre Oliva
05:59 egcs-ss-19990907 : bug in gcc/configure ? Marcel Cox
05:43 Re: Shared library that needs stuff from another library... Alexandre Oliva
05:29 Re: Shared library that needs stuff from another library... Alexandre Oliva
05:24 Re: gcc-2.95.1 on sun Alexandre Oliva
05:20 Re: configure failed Alexandre Oliva
05:17 Re: Problem for make gcc-2.95 Alexandre Oliva
04:25 Re: Strange strings in GCC compiled code Eli Zaretskii
03:21 Re: libiberty legal status ? Jeffrey A Law
03:11 Re: libiberty legal status ? Marc Espie
03:01 Re: libiberty legal status ? Jeffrey A Law
02:29 libiberty legal status ? Marc Espie
02:13 Problem for make gcc-2.95 JN_Lin
02:10 Re: Strange strings in GCC compiled code Nick Ing-Simmons
02:03 MMX regs and GCC Jeff Garzik
01:50 Re: Strange strings in GCC compiled code Eli Zaretskii
01:49 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
01:46 Re: Strange strings in GCC compiled code Eli Zaretskii
01:41 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
01:40 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
01:39 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
01:13 Re: wint_t in stddef.h - why? Jeffrey A Law
00:49 Re: New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...) Martin v. Loewis
00:45 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
00:43 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
00:41 Reload problem Andreas Schwab
00:39 Re: C++ Compiler Martin v. Loewis
00:09 Re: static_cast + virtual table = problems ? Martin v. Loewis
00:04 C++ Compiler Grafe, Christine

September 07, 1999
23:53 Re: New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...) Per Bothner
23:19 Re: Should fixinc be linked with libiberty.a? Jeffrey A Law
23:14 Re: New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...) Martin v. Loewis
21:37 Re: Shared library that needs stuff from another library... Mark Crosland
18:42 Re: New vtable ABI (was Re: Strange behaviour in C++...) Per Bothner
18:21 Re: configure failed N8TM
17:30 Re: gcc-2.95.2 rough plan Richard Henderson
17:13 static_cast + virtual table = problems ? Ulisses T. Mello
17:09 Re: Should we create an attribute malloc for supposed aliasbenefits? Mark Mitchell
16:24 Re: gcc-2.95.2 rough plan craig
16:21 Re: Strange strings in GCC compiled code Russ Allbery
15:52 Strange strings in GCC compiled code Nimar Arora
15:43 Re: Should fixinc be linked with libiberty.a? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:24 Re: Support for C9X in gcc? Martin v. Loewis
15:09 Re: gcc-2.95.2 rough plan Jeffrey A Law
14:56 gcc 2.95.1 sparc-sun-sunos4.1.4 bootstrap failed Marco Manfai Yu
14:53 Re: gcc-2.95.2 rough plan craig
14:46 Re: Should fixinc be linked with libiberty.a? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:41 re: configure failed James Black
13:37 Re: Should fixinc be linked with libiberty.a? Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:31 Re: som.h (was MPE Port) Jeffrey A Law
12:49 Shared library that needs stuff from another library... Mark Crosland
12:44 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files Dave Brolley
12:40 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files Dave Brolley
12:27 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files Zack Weinberg
12:03 Re: Machine-dependent bits for GC Joern Rennecke
11:37 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files Dave Brolley
09:35 egcs-ss-19990907 is now available law
09:15 Re: Support for C9X in gcc? Gerald Pfeifer
09:05 Re: Should we create an attribute malloc for supposed aliasbenefits? Mark Mitchell
09:00 Re: som.h (was MPE Port) Mark Klein
08:42 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
08:40 gcc-2.95.1 on sun shannon
08:40 Re: Support for C9X in gcc? Andi Kleen
06:46 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
06:40 Re: Should fixinc be linked with libiberty.a? Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:39 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
04:21 Re: gcc-2.95.2 rough plan Jeffrey A Law
03:44 Re: Machine-dependent bits for GC Bernd Schmidt
03:35 Re: Machine-dependent bits for GC Richard Earnshaw
03:33 Re: gcc-2.95.2 rough plan John Vickers
03:20 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
02:38 Re: MPE Port Jeffrey A Law
02:35 Re: Should fixinc be linked with libiberty.a? Jeffrey A Law
02:33 Re: gansidecl.h comments on PROTO ? Jeffrey A Law
02:14 Optimizing code Marting.Weber
01:28 Re: Support for C9X in gcc? Andreas Jaeger
01:10 gcc-2.95.2 rough plan Jeffrey A Law
01:08 Re: Support for C9X in gcc? Geoff Keating
00:23 Re: Troubles instaling GCC Jeffrey A Law
00:22 Re: Should we create an attribute malloc for supposed alias benefits? Jeffrey A Law
00:11 CABLE TV...MORE CHANNELS, No extra Charge Fine Tuning

September 06, 1999
23:48 Re: Support for C9X in gcc? Martin v. Loewis
22:16 Re: Machine-dependent bits for GC Mark Mitchell
17:49 Machine-dependent bits for GC Mark Mitchell
16:39 binutils 2.9.5.0.11 is released. H.J. Lu
15:03 Re: Should we create an attribute malloc for supposed alias benefits? Robert Lipe
14:47 Re: Definig scratch registers Jeffrey A Law
14:40 Re: C++ and static data members... Martin v. Loewis
14:37 Re: Instrumenting the compiler Jeffrey A Law
14:36 Re: Should we create an attribute malloc for supposed alias benefits? Jeffrey A Law
13:46 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files John Marshall
13:36 Should fixinc be linked with libiberty.a? Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:40 Should we create an attribute malloc for supposed alias benefits? Kaveh R. Ghazi
12:38 gansidecl.h comments on PROTO ? Marc Espie
11:42 Troubles instaling GCC Isaac Salsberg
10:51 Instrumenting the compiler Gil Hauer
10:40 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:40 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:40 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:40 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:40 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:40 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:40 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:39 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:39 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:39 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:39 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:39 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:39 Re: MPE Port Mark Klein
10:27 problem with -fomit-frame-pointer I Lee Hetherington
10:26 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files Joern Rennecke
07:22 Definig scratch registers Rotter Klaus
06:18 Possible gcc source locations which violate strict aliasing Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:04 LOSE 30 POUNDS IN 30 DAYS NOW! bizlandt
02:12 gcc2 merge Jeffrey A Law
02:05 Richard Kenner and Mark Mitchell Jeffrey A Law
01:55 Re: Unsuccessful build of a cross PowerPC GCC 2.95.x for an Intel Andreas Schwab
01:22 RE: Unsuccessful build of a cross PowerPC GCC 2.95.x for an Intel Patrick Lerda
01:10 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files Jeffrey A Law

September 05, 1999
22:50 Re: g++ inlining problem? Alexandre Oliva
22:38 Re: g++ inlining problem? Thomas Flynn
22:31 Re: g++ inlining problem? Alexandre Oliva
22:20 Re: g++ inlining problem? Thomas Flynn
20:06 Re: Unsuccessful build of a cross PowerPC GCC 2.95.x for an Intel Geoff Keating
19:52 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files Alexandre Oliva
19:45 Re: g++ inlining problem? Alexandre Oliva
17:50 Re: Unsuccessful build of a cross PowerPC GCC 2.95.x for an Intel Graham Stoney
17:42 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files craig
17:38 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files Zack Weinberg
17:33 Re: g++ inlining problem? Thomas Flynn
17:26 Re: g++ inlining problem? Jeffrey A Law
17:18 Re: g++ inlining problem? Thomas Flynn
17:07 Re: The treatment of null characters in C source files Jeffrey A Law
17:07 Re: g++ inlining problem? Jeffrey A Law
17:01 Re: gcc -fast Jeffrey A Law
16:58 Re: g++ inlining problem? Thomas Flynn
16:29 The treatment of null characters in C source files Zack Weinberg
15:09 gcc -fast Jeff Garzik
12:40 C++: How to disable/avoid namespaces. IvO
00:34 Re: Can cppalloc.c be removed? Per Bothner

September 04, 1999
22:57 9,000,000 "*BYTEBLE" email addresses PLUS! T & B Associates
21:46 Re: g++ inlining problem? Jeffrey A Law
20:24 GC change to `code' in RTL Mark Mitchell
19:38 Re: Can cppalloc.c be removed? Kaveh R. Ghazi
16:57 Non-compile on OSR 5 Jean-Pierre Radley
16:29 g++ inlining problem? Thomas Flynn
07:50 Re: Can cppalloc.c be removed? Per Bothner
07:30 Can cppalloc.c be removed? Kaveh R. Ghazi
03:44 khans patch Daniel Heiserer
00:07 Get Your { FREE!!! } Internet Stock Newsletter stockmarket

September 03, 1999
20:33 Re: C++ and static data members... Alexandre Oliva
16:23 PATCH to use xcalloc Mark Mitchell
16:16 Re: C++ and static data members... Theodore Papadopoulo
16:00 Re: RISC like operations for ix86 Jeffrey A Law
14:29 RE: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 Erik Mouw
12:37 Re: C++ and static data members... David_Abrahams
12:29 Re: C++ and static data members... Joern Rennecke
12:27 Strange output from g++/gcc (S.u.S.E 6.2) Evguenii SMOGAILOV
12:15 RISC like operations for ix86 Dan Nicolaescu
11:44 Support for C9X in gcc? Gavin Romig-Koch
11:43 Bug in EGCS AltiVec support? Timothy J. Wood
10:43 Re: Support for C9X in gcc? Zack Weinberg
10:41 Re: GC Merge? Jason Merrill
10:37 Support for C9X in gcc? Scott Ladd
10:25 Re: C++ and static data members... Joe Buck
10:13 Re: C++ and static data members... Theodore Papadopoulo
10:06 Re: GC Merge? Mark Mitchell
09:31 Re: GC Merge? Jason Merrill
08:19 Problems compiling using crypt and setgrent Bogus User
08:11 RE: Unsuccessful build of a cross PowerPC GCC 2.95.x for an Intel box (Details) Patrick Lerda
07:27 Re: gnu for intel craig
06:54 Re: Unsuccessful build of a cross PowerPC GCC 2.95.x for an Intel box David Edelsohn
06:38 Re: Compilation getting slower Brad Lucier
05:53 Re: gnu for intel Nathan Sidwell
05:45 Re: gnu for intel Davide Libenzi
05:42 gnu for intel baileyg
04:10 Perhaps useful information about optimisation Andreas Conz
02:54 Re: Jump optimizations (was Re: g77 performance on ALPHA) Jeffrey A Law
02:31 Unsuccessful build of a cross PowerPC GCC 2.95.x for an Intel box Patrick Lerda
02:29 Re: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 Lack Mr G M

September 02, 1999
22:36 Re: Compilation getting slower Andreas Jaeger
22:05 Re: Why we can't have nice discarding const warnings Zack Weinberg
20:08 Re: Compilation getting slower Richard Stallman
19:35 Re: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 N8TM
18:48 bitstrings [Was: Aliasing problems in GNU Chill?] Per Bothner
17:55 wint_t in stddef.h - why? Zack Weinberg
16:58 Re: Aliasing problems in GNU Chill? Jeffrey A Law
16:48 Re: Aliasing problems in GNU Chill? Jeffrey A Law
16:41 Re: C++ and static data members... Joe Buck
16:36 Re: C++ and static data members... Joe Buck
16:27 Re: C++ and static data members... Martin v. Loewis
16:19 Re: Compilation getting slower Jeffrey A Law
16:11 Re: Compilation getting slower Dan Pascu
16:10 RE: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 Billinghurst, David (RTD)
15:58 Re: warning to error Martin v. Loewis
15:52 C++ and static data members... Theodore Papadopoulo
14:10 Re: Jump optimizations (was Re: g77 performance on ALPHA) Joern Rennecke
14:01 Anonymous unions/structs Brad Fitzpatrick
13:46 Re: Jump optimizations (was Re: g77 performance on ALPHA) Richard Henderson
13:27 Re: Jump optimizations (was Re: g77 performance on ALPHA) John Wehle
13:25 Re: Aliasing problems in GNU Chill? David Starner
13:16 Re: GC Merge? Richard Henderson
13:07 Re: GC Merge? Mark Mitchell
13:06 Re: GC Merge? Mark Mitchell
12:54 Re: GC Merge? Richard Henderson
12:29 Re: Jump optimizations (was Re: g77 performance on ALPHA) Jeffrey A Law
12:15 Re: Jump optimizations (was Re: g77 performance on ALPHA) Richard Henderson
12:10 Re: Quick question Jeffrey A Law
12:00 Jump optimizations (was Re: g77 performance on ALPHA) John Wehle
11:54 Re: ASM_GENERATE_INTERNAL_LABEL synopsis ? Richard Henderson
11:34 GC Merge? Mark Mitchell
11:28 Re: wchar_t string functions? Alexandre Oliva
10:07 wchar_t string functions? edA-qa mort-ora-y
10:00 Re: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 James Beyer
09:57 Problem untarring gcc and g++ files. billinc
09:41 Re: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 Lack Mr G M
09:19 Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 Anna Winkler
08:43 Quick question Bevan Agard
08:13 warning to error James Beyer
07:35 Re: Why we can't have nice discarding const warnings Mark Mitchell
07:09 Re: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 James Beyer
06:58 Re: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 Lack Mr G M
06:55 C code help Christopher R. Jones
06:36 Re: Regarding anonymous unions, etc. Gavin Romig-Koch
05:40 Re: help!!! Alexandre Oliva
05:23 help!!! lam
04:33 Re: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 Lack Mr G M
03:52 Re: CVS Update: www.netwinder.org: pub Richard Earnshaw
03:45 cannot find crt1.o after installing gcc-2.95.1 Adam Kochanek
03:42 anonymous unions/structs for gcc 3.0 Damjan lango
03:01 Re: Why we can't have nice discarding const warnings Martin v. Loewis
02:25 Re: Why we can't have nice discarding const warnings Andreas Schwab
02:15 Re: Reload bug Andreas Schwab
01:53 Re: CVS Update: www.netwinder.org: pub Philip Blundell
01:45 Re: CVS Update: www.netwinder.org: pub Andreas Schwab
00:53 Re: Compilation getting slower Andreas Jaeger
00:32 Re: Reload bug Jeffrey A Law
00:24 Re: Regarding anonymous unions, etc. Jeffrey A Law

September 01, 1999
23:53 Re: Aliasing problems in GNU Chill? Jeffrey A Law
23:44 Re: g77 performance on ALPHA Jeffrey A Law
23:20 Re: Compilation getting slower Zack Weinberg
23:07 Re: Compilation getting slower Jeffrey A Law
22:55 Re: 2.95, x86: severe performance problems with short arithmetic Zack Weinberg
22:51 Compilation getting slower Richard Stallman
22:21 Re: Problem compiling glibc's with gcc-2.95.1 Geoff Keating
22:04 Re: Problem Jeffrey A Law
21:25 Re: platforms Jeffrey A Law
21:20 Re: global variable store optimization Jeffrey A Law
21:15 Re: RFI Jeffrey A Law
21:11 Re: platforms Joe Buck
21:09 Re: drop support for bootstrap with no <stdarg.h>? Jeffrey A Law
20:59 Re: drop support for bootstrap with no <stdarg.h>? Zack Weinberg
20:48 Re: drop support for bootstrap with no <stdarg.h>? Jeffrey A Law
20:41 RE: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 Billinghurst, David (RTD)
18:24 Why we can't have nice discarding const warnings Zack Weinberg
17:57 Re: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 N8TM
17:41 Aliasing problems in GNU Chill? David Starner
17:41 Re: Becoming a gcc developer Mike Stump
17:36 drop support for bootstrap with no <stdarg.h>? Zack Weinberg
17:23 Re: platforms Mike Stump
17:05 Re: RFI Martin v. Loewis
16:55 Re: Becoming a gcc developer Martin v. Loewis
16:41 Re: platforms Martin v. Loewis
16:22 Problem Mcfall, Troy D
15:05 platforms wam
14:50 Re: RFI Joe Buck
14:36 Becoming a gcc developer David Abrahams
14:21 RFI Nearby Star Observers
13:58 Re: CVS Update: www.netwinder.org: pub Philip Blundell
13:45 Re: egcs/Solaris status craig
13:14 Re: g77 performance on ALPHA Toon Moene
12:24 Re: g77 performance on ALPHA John Wehle
11:55 Re: Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 James Beyer
11:44 Re: RTL type checking Zack Weinberg
11:40 Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 (more of them). Lack Mr G M
11:40 global variable store optimization Aaron Holtzman
10:56 Re: template <class T> myList<T>::myList() fails Alexandre Oliva
10:50 Unsuccessful build of gcc-2.95.1 Lack Mr G M
10:42 Re: Problem compiling glibc's with gcc-2.95.1 Jeffrey A Law
10:12 Re: egcs/Solaris status Dimitri PAPADOPOULOS-ORFANOS
09:59 Re: g77 performance on ALPHA Nick Ing-Simmons
09:44 Re: Problem compiling glibc's with gcc-2.95.1 Russ Allbery
08:40 Reload bug Andreas Schwab
08:33 Re: Problem compiling glibc's with gcc-2.95.1 Gerard Flynn
05:58 Re: Problem compiling glibc's with gcc-2.95.1 Jeffrey A Law
04:36 Problem compiling glibc's with gcc-2.95.1 Gerard Flynn
03:54 Successful Installations of gcc-2.95.1 Tom Browder
03:40 template <class T> myList<T>::myList() fails Adam Kochanek
02:15 Re: Memory leaks? Theodore Papadopoulo
01:52 HOW TO MEET BEAUTIFUL WOMEN eddiefaskell


Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

Mail converted by MHonArc 2.4.4