This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: built gcc 2.95 on i386-pc-bsdi3.1
- To: roderik at ripe dot net
- Subject: Re: built gcc 2.95 on i386-pc-bsdi3.1
- From: John Wehle <john at feith dot com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 13:05:38 -0400 (EDT)
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, bug-gcc at gnu dot org, law at cygnus dot com
> So if `filds' is an illegal instruction, is gcc 2.95's `configure'
> script wrong in defining HAVE_GAS_FILDS_FISTS? I'm >90% sure I've seen
> it defining that...
`filds' isn't an illegal instruction, however it is spelled differently
depending on what assembler you are using. Most assemblers seem to
spell it `fild', some old versions of gas spell it `filds'. The problem
you've encountered can happen if configure finds a different assembler
from what is used at run time.
-- John
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Feith Systems | Voice: 1-215-646-8000 | Email: john@feith.com |
| John Wehle | Fax: 1-215-540-5495 | |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------