This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Zack Weinberg wrote: > > where push, pop, and stack_empty are operations on some generic stack. > By doing this, you avoid having to push "stop", the return address, > the frame pointer, any call-saved registers, and so on. It can be a > *huge* win in terms of stack usage. What about speed, assuming there is enough memory? -- Kevin Atkinson kevinatk@home.com http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |