This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: sparc vs lapack

To: craig at jcb-sc dot com
Subject: Re: sparc vs lapack
From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1999 10:34:07 -0700
Cc: law at cygnus dot com, egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
References: <19990714015112.13302.qmail@deer> <13736.931932192@upchuck.cygnus.com> <19990714233335.C9030@cygnus.com> <19990715140333.2112.qmail@deer>

On Thu, Jul 15, 1999 at 02:03:33PM -0000, craig@jcb-sc.com wrote:
> Do we know of any code in common use where this matters?

In use now?  No, which is one of the reasons I havn't fixed it.
(I don't think Fortran statement functions are that common.)

However, ISO C9X added all sorts of gnifty complex math functions,
and so I have to fix the problem to pass the brand new glibc tests.


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: sparc vs lapack
  - From: craig

References:
- Re: sparc vs lapack
  - From: craig
- Re: sparc vs lapack
  - From: Jeffrey A Law
- Re: sparc vs lapack
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: sparc vs lapack
  - From: craig

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]