This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
RE: Help with DG/UX Intel port
- To: <law at cygnus dot com>
- Subject: RE: Help with DG/UX Intel port
- From: "Eric Raskin" <ehr at listworks dot com>
- Date: Fri, 30 Apr 1999 17:34:49 -0400
- Cc: <egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com>
- Reply-To: <ehr at listworks dot com>
> From: Jeffrey A Law [mailto:law@upchuck.cygnus.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 1999 3:23 PM
> To: ehr
> Cc: egcs@egcs.cygnus.com
> Subject: Re: Help with DG/UX Intel port
> The first thing to do is find out what is different between two of the .o
> files. Sometimes assemblers put timestamps or temporary filenames into
the
> .o file which causes comparison failures.
I compared gcc/xgcc with gcc/stage2/xgcc by taking a hex dump of each and
using sdiff to compare the hex dumps. They are different throughout the
file,
not just at the beginning. Unfortunately, I don't know enough to tell what
particular section it's in (.text or .data), but I know that it is
throughout
the file. So, I assume that the compiler is creating different code.
I built the stage 1 compiler using 2.8.1. I can also build it using
2.7.2,
if you think that would make a difference. (2.7.2 is the compiler actually
released with DG/UX. I built 2.8.1 myself from the gnu distribution).
Otherwise, is there anything else I might try before I give up? And, do
you
still want the patches I had to produce to get this far?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric H. Raskin Voice: 914-769-7100 x321
President, CSC Division Fax: 914-769-8070
The Listworks Corp. E-Mail: ehr@listworks.com
1 Campus Drive
Pleasantville, NY 10570