This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: multiple definitions of 'xxx keyed to...' in egcs-1.1.1



  In message <m10EJQj-000392C@ocean.lucon.org>you write:
  > > 
  > > 
  > >   In message <m10DUeS-00038sC@ocean.lucon.org>you write:
  > >   > You got it backward. Making ctors/dtors local on ELF FIXES the bug on
  > >   > ELF. However, your patch won't hurt.
  > > Yours works by introducing an ELF specific hack.
  > > 
  > > Jason's patch, while not 100% correct either is a lot closer than yours s
  > ince
  > 
  > Mine is 100% correct on ELF.
And totally useless everywhere else.


  > That is fine. But why cannot we have both? That way, ELF will be 100%
  > correct and others will be almost correct? For me, this discussion
  > makes few difference. I will make ELF 100% safe for Linux in anycase.
Send me a patch and I'll consider it.  I will not accept a hack.



jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]