This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Namespace bug?
- To: fischer at zkm dot de, martin at mira dot isdn dot cs dot tu-berlin dot de
- Subject: Re: Namespace bug?
- From: mrs at wrs dot com (Mike Stump)
- Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 01:38:02 -0800
- Cc: egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 10:21:22 +0100
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hans=2DJ=F6rg?= Fischer <fischer@zkm.de>
> I am sorry, I should habe read them first. However, the files you
> name form part of the MICO distribution which is really
> complex. Therefore, I decided not to include them in my eMail.
Complexity isn't a good reason to not submit a bug report. g++ -E
will include all necessary bits (if the bug can be show by one
translation unit).
> Is it correct therefore that I cannot partition a class
> implementation into different source files?
No. You can do that all you want, what you are required to do, is
define all virtual members.
> Is this according to standard C++ specs?
Yes.