This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: kernel-2.2.1-undefined references.
- To: Lee Iverson <leei at ai dot sri dot com>
- Subject: Re: kernel-2.2.1-undefined references.
- From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds at transmeta dot com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 17:53:16 -0800 (PST)
- cc: Joe Buck <jbuck at Synopsys dot COM>, ross dot s at ihug dot co dot nz, egcs at cygnus dot com, hpa at transmeta dot com
On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Lee Iverson wrote:
>
> I actually did, and while the discussion of "extern inline" strongly
> implies that it is guaranteed behavior, it doesn't *really* come out
> and say it. There is a hedge above though in the sentence "Note that
> certain usages in a function definition can make it unsuitable for
> inline substitution." It looks like that is just a hedge on automatic
> inlining, but it is really a hedge on the whole process...
And while you're at it, what's your definition for "sex"?
It's ugly in politics, it's ugly in technican discussions. Don't hide
behind technicalities.
Linus