This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: mutex in frame code
- To: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, Mike Stump <mrs at wrs dot com>
- Subject: Re: mutex in frame code
- From: Richard Henderson <rth at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Mon, 1 Feb 1999 09:35:44 -0800
- Cc: jbuck at Synopsys dot COM, law at cygnus dot com, drepper at cygnus dot com, egcs at cygnus dot com, richard dot earnshaw at arm dot com
- References: <199901262119.NAA01628@kankakee.wrs.com> <199902011536.PAA05753@sun52.NIS.cambridge>
On Mon, Feb 01, 1999 at 03:36:10PM +0000, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> > > From: Joe Buck <jbuck@Synopsys.COM>
> > This is unfortunate. We need a command decision to bit the bullet and
> > then to make the ports conform to this decision and document it.
> > :-( My guess is the SPARC port is wrong and should be fixed.
>
> Well on the ARM, -mcpu=<cpu> is short-hand for "-march=<archof(cpu)>
> -mtune=cpu". It makes life a little more complicated for me, but much
> easier for the user since only one option has to be given instead of two.
If we commonize on anything, I think it should be `arch' and `tune';
`cpu' is too ambiguous.
r~