This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: New gcc port (ATMEL AVR) and question
- To: meissner at cygnus dot com (Michael Meissner)
- Subject: Re: New gcc port (ATMEL AVR) and question
- From: Joern Rennecke <amylaar at cygnus dot co dot uk>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jan 1999 00:00:31 +0000 (GMT)
- Cc: bill at taniwha dot tssc dot co dot nz, meissner at cygnus dot com, denis at medo dot fov dot uni-mb dot si, egcs at egcs dot cygnus dot com
> I disagree. In theory, reload can do a general recog call just like any other
> pass does. It might slow things down a little, but it would allow better
> tailoring of the move insns (after all, on most platforms, we already are out
> of constraint letters, etc.).
So how do you propose to handle cases when the rerecognition fails completely
because some operands still need reloading?