This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86
>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Lehmann <pcg@goof.com> writes:
Marc> Since *most* functions just call i386 assembly equivalents,
Marc> there should be no rounding problems, but remember that I
Marc> didn't say this ;)
I'll try to run the referenced (thanks rth) libm test stuff to check
sometime in the new year if no-one beats me to it.
- References:
- Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86
- Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86
- Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86
- Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86
- Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86
- Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86
- Re: FWD: FLOATING-POINT CONSISTENCY, -FFLOAT-STORE, AND X86