This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++: EGCS perf. vs GCC
- To: Jeffrey A Law <law at hurl dot cygnus dot com>
- Subject: Re: C++: EGCS perf. vs GCC
- From: Alex Maranda <amaranda at spider dot com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Dec 1998 17:42:31 +0000 (GMT)
- cc: egcs at cygnus dot com, egcs-bugs at cygnus dot com
please read below
Alex Maranda mailto: amaranda@spider.com
Spider Software Ltd. Tel: +44 (0)131 4757036
Edinburgh, UK http://members.xoom.com/Alex_Maranda
STREAMS based communications protocols for embedded systems
On Mon, 7 Dec 1998, Jeffrey A Law wrote:
> Good :-) Both the ppro/pII and the old pentium scheduling need major changes;
> as does the entire machine description. It's going to be a long slow process.
I've lived most of my life on SPARC, I had no idea gcc/egcs on x86 has
such serious problems. As for my network simulator, things can only get
better :-)
> We are slowly, but surely moving the major features from pgcc into egcs. Will
> pgcc help your code? Maybe, maybe not.
I am downloading pgcc1.1a as I write; thanks to everybody for the
plethora of options I've been flooded with :-). The next report will have
all three mighty compilers side by side, with those options on.
Perhaps I can help (hopefully nobody's laughing) with the evaluation of
the mods to be introduced in the x86 scheduler; I think my app has the
attributes required for a good scheduler meter, and it doesn't use
controversial semantics (templates, exceptions).
Cheers,
Alex