This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Results for egcs-2.92.18 19981106 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu
- To: Nix <nix-egcs at esperi dot demon dot co dot uk>
- Subject: Re: Results for egcs-2.92.18 19981106 (gcc2 ss-980609 experimental) testsuite on i586-pc-linux-gnu
- From: Jeffrey A Law <law at cygnus dot com>
- Date: Sun, 08 Nov 1998 23:58:29 -0700
- cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Reply-To: law at cygnus dot com
In message <13892.30408.626015.318278@loki.wkstn.nix>you write:
> Sources: - egcs mainline from CVS last updated at Tue Oct 27 19:25:02 1
> 998
> - libg++-2.8.1.2
> Patches:
> Environment: - GNU binutils 2.9.1.0.15
> - dejagnu-980528
> - gperf-2.7 with gperf-2.7-19981006 patch for -F
> - Linux stable kernel 2.0.35 (compiled by gcc-2.7.2.3)
> - glibc 2.0.6 (compiled by egcs-1.0.2)
>
> Remarks: Smooth build, -O[1-9] still broken, libg++
> accordingly not building.
>
> Is -Os working well enough for me to do tests with
> that? Anyone think it'd be useful?
Yes, -Os should work as reliably as any other optimization option. It *should*
be part of the standard c-torture tests already.
jeff