This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: i386-pc-solaris2.5.1: recent snapshots can't build emacs-20.2
- To: law at cygnus dot com
- Subject: Re: i386-pc-solaris2.5.1: recent snapshots can't build emacs-20.2
- From: Jim Meyering <meyering at ascend dot com>
- Date: 17 Aug 1998 14:26:53 -0500
- Cc: egcs at cygnus dot com, rms at gnu dot org
- References: <11862.903381169@hurl.cygnus.com>
| In message <87yasnenke.fsf@ascend.com>you write:
| > Jeffrey A Law <law@hurl.cygnus.com> writes:
| >
| > | In message <873eawf8n0.fsf@ascend.com>you write:
| > | > I did try to build a few `cvs update -D DATE'-selected
| > | > versions of egcs, but none of them bootstrapped. What version
| > | > of CVS is running on Cygnus' egcs repository?
| > | cvs-1.9.21, but that really shouldn't have anything to do with being unab
| > le
| > | to bootstrap egcs
| > |
| > | What problems are you having bootstrapping?
| >
| > Here's what I got when trying to bootstrap the official egcs-19980615
| > snapshot:
| [ ... ]
| OK. This has nothing to do with whatever cvs version we're running. It
| sounds more like the typical development instability. What happens if
| you try to build something newer, paricularly off the egcs-1.1 branch?
| jeff
Whoops. I misunderstood.
I have *not* been doing `cvs update -DDATE' for a month.
I'm convinced that it's just instability as you say.
The problem is that I didn't have time to find out which subsequent
patch fixed the bootstrap problem I saw when trying to localize the
emacs-build-breaking change. Unfortunately, I don't expect to have
much time to work on this for the next week or so -- I'll be offline
from Thur through Mon.