This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: loop optimizations, mark 9


> The x86 doesn't bootstrap with these changes.  Unfortunately c-torture
> doesn't show any regressions with these changes, so we don't have a
> simple testcase handy :(

That's a shame.  Something to look into.

> I thought we had addressed the issue which originally led to your
> disabling of the 2nd loop optimization pass?  Did I mis-understand
> something the last time we discussed these patches?

No, we'd never addressed that.

> Performance on spec92 on the x86 was kind-of hit or miss.

With spec95 on alpha, not all even ran successfully, though I don't
recall any performance regressions.  Though that test run also included
the new gcse bits, so it's not as clear-cut as it might have been.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]