This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
egcs-1.0.2 under SuSE Linux 5.1 (kernel 2.0.33)
- To: egcs at cygnus dot com
- Subject: egcs-1.0.2 under SuSE Linux 5.1 (kernel 2.0.33)
- From: Jesper Wolf Jespersen <jwj at dde dot dk>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 1998 21:32:10 +0200
I have sucessfully built egcs 1.0.2 under SuSE Linux 5.1, but I get some
results that dont seem to match the results posted on the egcs list.
The Machine I am running on is a Intel Pentium II 300 Mhz, AL440LX
motherboard with 96 megs of ram and two SCSI disks under an Adaptec
controller. I Chose to use SuSE linux since it seems that their Adaptec
driver works. The redhat 5.0 I installed previously truly messed up my
drive so I had to low level format it.
Well all the introductions aside here are my results from a make check:
----
jwj@jwj-lan34:/pub/src/objdir > find . -name "*sum" -exec grep
$'^[#F\t]' {} \;
=== libio tests ===
=== libio Summary ===
# of expected passes 40
=== libstdc++ tests ===
=== libstdc++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 30
=== gcc tests ===
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 4883
# of expected failures 5
# of unsupported tests 7
=== g++ tests ===
FAIL: g++.eh/spec2.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/spec4.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh33.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh44.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh5.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh50.C Execution test
FAIL: g++.mike/eh51.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3393
# of unexpected failures 7
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 82
# of untested testcases 6
=== g77 tests ===
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-finline-functions -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/dnrm2.f execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer
-fin2.line-functions -funroll-all-loops
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 130
# of unexpected failures 2
----
The gnu C used for the initial compilation is 2.7.2.1 and 'ld' and 'as'
both report version 2.8.1. Finaly here is the contents of
config.status:#!/bin/sh
# This file was generated automatically by configure. Do not edit.
# This directory was configured as follows:
.../egcs-1.0.2/configure --host=i686-pc-linux-gnulibc1 --norecursion
#
----
I am a bit puzzled that som many exception handling tests went wrong. Is
this typical for this setup or is something wrong ?
I tried compiling the snapshot from March 21, but it didnt complete the
make check. So I went back to the latest release.
Greetings from Denmark
Jesper Wolf Jespersen