This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: RedHat 5.0, Cyrix processor and egcs
- To: Stephen Williams <steve at icarus dot icarus dot com>
- Subject: Re: RedHat 5.0, Cyrix processor and egcs
- From: John Runar Hovland <root at 209-142-3-90 dot stk dot inreach dot net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Dec 1997 14:33:13 -0800
- cc: egcs at cygnus dot com
>
> I've been getting signal 11 errors with the bundled gcc (the gcc pointed to
> by the errata seems to work) so I wonder if anyone has installed EGCS on
> linux/intel with a 6x86 processor, and whether that install is reliable.
I run egcs-1.00 on my 6x86-P200+, and it is quite reliable for me so
far... I'm also using glibc-2.0.5c... I haven't compiled too many things
with it (dosemu, modutils, kernel, amp, maybe a few others), and I have
no complaints...
>
> Have you done things like compile the 2.0.32 kernel with it?
>
I'm using a 2.1.76 Linux kernel I compiled with egcs-1.00. It's been
running a few days with no problems related to egcs AFAIK
(sound driver isn't working (it's a module); 90% sure that's a
kernel/configuration problem)
I haven't tried compiling any 2.0.x kernels with it; I've seen a few
messages bouncing around the egcs list that suggest to me the 2.0.3x
kernels are broken w.r.t. egcs and gcc-2.8 (specifically, changes
to -funroll-all-loops handling is exposing a kernel problem) while
the 2.1.7x kernels (76, at least) are fine.
Bottom line, IMHO 2.0.32 shouldn't be compiled with egcs or gcc-2.8,
whether or not you've got a 6x86.
-Runar
rhovland@soda.csua.berkeley.edu