This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: disturbing g++ 971031 results. defer-pop to blame?


> Real strange since I've actually looked in the log files when I've
> done H8 testing and everything seems to be in order...  Got to
> be something simple/stupid we're missing.

Probably.   I'll investigate that next.

>   > Now is when I notice that GDB is not playing nice with EGCS ELF output.
>   > When it rains...
> Sigh.  More likely it's not playing nice with dwarf2 more so than
> ELF.

Yes, and '-gdwarf1' results in unresolved externals.   Sigh.   I'm 
investigating that right now.

Let's focus on this problem right now:

>   > >   > If I add '-defer-pop' to most of the cases I've tried by hand, it
>   > >   > seems to work.   In  fact, I just wrote a script to loop through thos
>   > I meant "-fdefer-pop".   -fno-defer-pop (the default) still shows the 
>   > problem.
> Hmmm, -fdefer-pop is the default; the compiler will arrange for
> -fno-defer-pop to be on inside EH regions and such.  Real strange.

Actually, it's only the default if we're optimizing, right?  That's
what I'm led to believe from 'gcc -S' output.   That's actually
consistent with some more tests that I just ran.

Perhaps we need to make the c++ tests run with varying -O levels
as we do for the gcc tests.  After all, what's another few hours
during the build? :-)

Here's what I'm seeing.   negcs is just a script that calls the native
egcs:

G=/play/negcs
L=${G}/libraries
exec ${G}/gcc/xgcc -B${G}/gcc/ \
        -I${L}/libio/ \
        -I${L}/libstdc++/ \
        "$@"

$ ./negcs /tmp/net34.C -lstdc++ && ./a.out
bar_1::k -> 1
bar_2::k -> 2
bar_1::get_k() -> 1
bar_2::get_k() -> 2
Memory fault(coredump)
(robertl) rjlhome:/play/testgcc
$ ./negcs -O0 /tmp/net34.C -lstdc++ && ./a.out
bar_1::k -> 1
bar_2::k -> 2
bar_1::get_k() -> 1
bar_2::get_k() -> 2
Memory fault(coredump)
(robertl) rjlhome:/play/testgcc
$ ./negcs -O1 /tmp/net34.C -lstdc++ && ./a.out
bar_1::k -> 1
bar_2::k -> 2
bar_1::get_k() -> 1
bar_2::get_k() -> 2
(robertl) rjlhome:/play/testgcc
$ ./negcs -O2 /tmp/net34.C -lstdc++ && ./a.out
bar_1::k -> 1
bar_2::k -> 2
bar_1::get_k() -> 1
bar_2::get_k() -> 2
(robertl) rjlhome:/play/testgcc
$ ./negcs -O3 /tmp/net34.C -lstdc++ && ./a.out
bar_1::k -> 1
bar_2::k -> 2
bar_1::get_k() -> 1
bar_2::get_k() -> 2
$

Perhaps something is doing something bad on the stack and defer-pop
is just circumventing it.

RJL


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]