This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Re: alpha return address patch


> I don't think using RETURN_ADDR_RTX should force the return address into
> the stack; the current code should be able to handle having the return
> address in a register just fine.

Except that it is very difficult to handle writing to that value
and having it be seen by the epilogue.

If you can suggest, perhaps, a way to do elimination such that
one way we have a (mem (plus (reg FP) (const ofs))) and the
other a (reg RA), I'd be delighted to use it.


r~


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]