This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
regression test results for 970904 on alpha-dec-osf4.0
- To: egcs at cygnus dot COM
- Subject: regression test results for 970904 on alpha-dec-osf4.0
- From: scott snyder <snyder at d0sgif dot fnal dot gov>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 1997 23:47:02 -0500 (CDT)
hi -
Here are results from running the test suite on the 970904
snapshot on a alpha-dec-osf4.0 target.
Here's the gcc summary:
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 4863
# of unexpected failures 16
# of expected failures 4
# of unsupported tests 7
Executing on host: /d0sgif/data1/snyder/egcs-build/ALPHA/gcc/xgcc -v
Here are the failures:
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/961203-1.c, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
This is a known problem with this test.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/cbrt.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/cbrt.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/cbrt.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/cbrt.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
As reported earlier, this is due to assumption in this test case
that 2*sizeof(long) == sizeof(double), which is false for the alpha.
If this is fixed, this test passes.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/complex-5.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
As discussed before, passing __complex__ arguments is broken.
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-1.c execution, -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -finline-functions
This is apparently a problem with the test harness; the program needs
to be compiled with -mieee.
The failures which i saw previously with 920411-1.c and m-un-1.c
are gone now.
And for g++:
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 3260
# of unexpected failures 3
# of unexpected successes 6
# of expected failures 82
# of untested testcases 6
The changes from the last test are the same as for other platforms.
FAIL: g++.brendan/crash19.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.ext/pretty.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.mike/p811.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.brendan/array1.C overflow in array dimension.* , (test for errors, line 6)
XPASS: g++.brendan/scope4.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.law/profile1.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.law/profile1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.law/temps7.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.mike/p7325.C *-*-* Execution test
sss