This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Many Fortran tests failing on i386-linux, introduced by r190051:190054
- From: Geoff Keating <geoffk at geoffk dot org>
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org, Thomas König <tkoenig at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2012 21:59:35 -0700
- Subject: Many Fortran tests failing on i386-linux, introduced by r190051:190054
Results for 4.8.0 20120801 (experimental) (GCC) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
I'm seeing 3353 tests failing, almost all of them Fortran. The problem seems to have been introduced between r190051 and r190054 and persists in r190063, which means it's probably this change:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
r190054 | tkoenig | 2012-08-01 14:43:50 -0700 (Wed, 01 Aug 2012) | 15 lines
2012-08-01 Thomas König <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/54033
* scanner.c (add_path_to_list): Emit warning if an error occurs
for an include path, if it is not present or if it is not a
directory. Do not add the path in these cases.
2012-08-01 Thomas König <tkoenig@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/54033
* gfortran.dg/include_6.f90: New test case.
* gfortran.dg/include_7.f90: New test case.
* gfortran.dg/include_3.f90: Add dg-warning for missing directory.
Normally the automated regression tester would have sent this mail, but there are so many tests failing that its mails are being rejected for being more than 1Mbytes.
As always there are more details available at http://glutton.geoffk.org/HEAD/
and especially http://glutton.geoffk.org/HEAD/native-regress.txt.gzip
is the current list of failing tests.