This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 4.5.0 20090402 (experimental) [trunk revision 145453] (GCC) testsuite on armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
- From: Laurent GUERBY gcc50 <guerby at gcc50 dot fsffrance dot org>
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sat, 04 Apr 2009 06:55:51 +0200
- Subject: Results for 4.5.0 20090402 (experimental) [trunk revision 145453] (GCC) testsuite on armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
LAST_UPDATED: Thu Apr 2 15:23:57 UTC 2009 (revision 145453)
Native configuration is armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
=== libgomp tests ===
Running target unix
=== libgomp Summary ===
# of expected passes 246
# of unsupported tests 7
=== libmudflap tests ===
Running target unix
=== libmudflap Summary ===
# of expected passes 1740
# of unsupported tests 2
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.dg/20021014-1.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/20021014-1.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-stdint-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/fshort-wchar.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/fshort-wchar.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gcc.dg/memcpy-1.c scan-tree-dump-times optimized "nasty_local" 0
FAIL: gcc.dg/nest.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/nest.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gcc.dg/nested-func-4.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/nested-func-4.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr32450.c (test for excess errors)
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/pr32450.c compilation failed to produce executable
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr39323-2.c scan-assembler .align[\\\\t ]*268435456
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr39323-3.c scan-assembler .align[\\\\t ]*268435456
FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c unconditional (test for warnings, line 8)
FAIL: gcc.dg/uninit-13.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: largefile.c -O0 -g -I. (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O0 -g assembly comparison
FAIL: largefile.c -O0 -I. (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O0 assembly comparison
FAIL: largefile.c -O1 -I. (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O1 assembly comparison
FAIL: largefile.c -O2 -I. (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O2 assembly comparison
FAIL: largefile.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -I. (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer assembly comparison
FAIL: largefile.c -O3 -g -I. (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -O3 -g assembly comparison
FAIL: largefile.c -Os -I. (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/pch/largefile.c -Os assembly comparison
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/bb-reorg.c execution, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c compilation, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/tree-prof/pr34999.c execution, -fprofile-use -D_PROFILE_USE
FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-35.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 2 loops" 1
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/polytypes.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lowf32.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lowp16.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lowp8.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lows16.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lows32.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lows64.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lows8.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lowu16.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lowu32.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lowu64.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
FAIL: gcc.target/arm/neon/vget_lowu8.c scan-assembler vmov[ \\t]+[dD][0-9]+, [dD][0-9]+!?([ \\t]+@[a-zA-Z0-9 ]+)?\\n
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 54395
# of unexpected failures 40
# of expected failures 204
# of unresolved testcases 7
# of unsupported tests 567
/home/guerby/build/gcc/xgcc version 4.5.0 20090402 (experimental) [trunk revision 145453] (GCC)
Compiler version: 4.5.0 20090402 (experimental) [trunk revision 145453] (GCC)
Platform: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi
configure flags: --prefix=/n/50/guerby/install-trunk --enable-languages=c --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-nls --enable-threads=posix --with-mpfr=/opt/cfarm/mpfr-2.3.2 --disable-multilib --enable-stage1-checking=release