This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 3.2 20020502 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin
- From: "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <David dot Billinghurst at riotinto dot com>
- To: <gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 10:03:55 +1000
- Subject: Results for 3.2 20020502 (experimental) testsuite on i686-pc-cygwin
LAST_UPDATED: Fri May 3 04:04:02 2002
Native configuration is i686-pc-cygwin
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.dg/ext/instantiate3.C scan-assembler-not
FAIL: g++.dg/parse/stack1.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/template/typename2.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Wunused-2.C (test for warnings, line 5)
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-2.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/conpr-3.C execution test
FAIL: g++.dg/special/initp1.C execution test
FAIL: g++.eh/badalloc1.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.ext/attrib5.C Execution test
XPASS: g++.jason/template18.C (test for excess errors)
XPASS: g++.jason/template18.C Execution test
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 7293
# of unexpected failures 10
# of unexpected successes 3
# of expected failures 86
# of untested testcases 15
# of unsupported tests 3
/usr/local/obj/gcc/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 3.2 20020502 (experimental)
=== g77 tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O0
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O1
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O2
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/6367.f execution, -Os
FAIL: g77.f-torture/execute/u77-test.f execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
=== g77 Summary ===
# of expected passes 1633
# of unexpected failures 9
/usr/local/obj/gcc/gcc/testsuite/../g77 version 3.2 20020502 (experimental)
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011219-1.c compilation, -O1
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011219-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011219-1.c compilation, -O2
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011219-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011219-1.c compilation, -O3 -g
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011219-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011219-1.c compilation, -Os
UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/20011219-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020402-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020412-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020412-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020412-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020412-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020412-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20020412-1.c execution, -O3 -g
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2e.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.dg/20020418-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-memset-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/i386-sse-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-2.c applying #pragma weak (test for warnings, line 33)
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-3.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-4.c applying #pragma weak (test for warnings, line 41)
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-4.c applying #pragma weak (test for warnings, line 73)
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-5.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-6.c (test for errors, line 4)
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak-7.c (test for excess errors)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 18520
# of unexpected failures 21
# of unexpected successes 1
# of expected failures 65
# of unresolved testcases 4
# of unsupported tests 54
/usr/local/obj/gcc/gcc/xgcc version 3.2 20020502 (experimental)
=== objc tests ===
Running target unix
=== objc Summary ===
# of expected passes 1036
# of expected failures 6
/usr/local/obj/gcc/gcc/xgcc version 3.2 20020502 (experimental)
=== libstdc++-v3 tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: 21_strings/capacity.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/collate_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/money_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/moneypunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/num_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/numpunct_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_get_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
XPASS: 22_locale/time_put_members_wchar_t.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/filebuf_members.cc execution test
FAIL: 27_io/ios_base_storage.cc execution test
=== libstdc++-v3 Summary ===
# of expected passes 372
# of unexpected failures 3
# of unexpected successes 9
# of expected failures 16
Compiler version: 3.2 20020502 (experimental)
Platform: i686-pc-cygwin
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-cygwin --enable-threads=posix --disable-libgcj --enable-sjlj-exceptions --with-system-zlib --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --disable-shared
Counting all warnings,
there are 86 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
23 gcc/combine.c
10 gcc/regclass.c
9 gcc/gcc.c
8 insn-attrtab.c
4 gcc/optabs.c
4 gcc/java/lex.c
3 gcc/unroll.c
3 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
3 /usr/share/bison/bison.simple
2 gcc/varasm.c
2 gcc/real.c
2 gcc/java/javaop.def
2 gcc/fold-const.c
1 gcc/unwind-pe.h
1 gcc/tree.c
1 gcc/sdbout.c
1 gcc/reload.c
1 gcc/java/jvspec.c
1 gcc/function.c
1 gcc/flow.c
1 gcc/f/where.c
1 gcc/emit-rtl.c
1 gcc/config/i386/i386.c
1 gcc/cfgrtl.c
Number of warning types:
41 comparison between signed and unsigned
7 string length \`???' is greater than the length \`???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
7 \`???' defined but not used
4 traditional C rejects string concatenation
4 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
4 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
3 unused variable \`???'
3 label \`???' defined but not used
2 unused parameter \`???'
2 operation on \`???' may be undefined
2 comparison is always true due to limited range of data type
2 comparison is always false due to limited range of data type
2 assignment of read-only location
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
1 function declaration isn't a prototype
1 assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type