This is the mail archive of the
gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Results for 3.0 20010307 (prerelease) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- To: gcc-testresults at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Subject: Results for 3.0 20010307 (prerelease) testsuite on i686-pc-linux-gnu
- From: Gordon Sadler <gbsadler1 at lcisp dot com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2001 14:36:05 -0600
Native configuration is i686-pc-linux-gnu
=== gcc tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010114-2.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010123-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O0
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O1
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010124-1.c execution, -Os
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991118-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/991118-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/bf64-1.c execution, -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/bf64-1.c execution, -O3 -g
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/loop-2b.c execution, -O2
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000724-1.c execution test
FAIL: gcc.dg/20001117-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c sequence point warning (test for warnings, line 59)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c90-scanf-1.c writing into NULL (test for warnings, line 118)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/c90-scanf-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/xopen-1.c multiple use of scanf argument (test for warnings, line 115)
FAIL: gcc.dg/format/xopen-1.c multiple use of scanf argument (test for warnings, line 115)
=== gcc Summary ===
# of expected passes 15017
# of unexpected failures 29
# of expected failures 78
# of unsupported tests 20
gcc version 3.0 20010307 (prerelease)
=== g++ tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.other/crash31.C parse error (test for errors, line 11)
FAIL: g++.other/crash31.C (test for excess errors)
=== g++ Summary ===
# of expected passes 6423
# of unexpected failures 4
# of expected failures 86
# of untested testcases 9
gcc version 3.0 20010307 (prerelease)
Compiler version: 3.0 20010307 (prerelease)
Platform: i686-pc-linux-gnu
configure flags: --host=i686-pc-linux-gnu --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --enable-threads=posix --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared --prefix=/home/gbsadler/gcc-2001-03-07 --with-system-zlib
Counting all warnings,
there are 186 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
81 gcc/gcc.c
28 gcc/combine.c
17 gcc/cp/lang-specs.h
10 gcc/reg-stack.c
6 gcc/cp/pt.c
5 gcc/cse.c
5 gcc/cp/error.c
4 gcc/cp/call.c
3 gcc/reload1.c
3 gcc/config/i386/i386.c
2 insn-emit.c
2 hashtab.c
2 gcc/reload.c
2 gcc/function.c
2 gcc/fold-const.c
2 gcc/expr.c
2 gcc/config/i386/i386.md
2 gcc/alias.c
1 gcc/sched-deps.c
1 gcc/regmove.c
1 gcc/final.c
1 gcc/expmed.c
1 gcc/dwarfout.c
1 gcc/cp/init.c
1 gcc/cp/errfn.c
1 gcc/cp/decl.c
Number of warning types:
57 comparison between signed and unsigned
47 missing initializer
47 (near initialization for \`???')
9 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
4 string length \`???' is greater than the length \`???' ISO C89 compilers are required to support
4 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
3 unused variable \`???'
2 passing arg ??? of \`???' from incompatible pointer type
2 function declaration isn't a prototype
2 destination missing a mode?
1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
1 passing arg ??? of \`???' discards qualifiers from pointer target type
1 integer constant is unsigned in ISO C, signed with -traditional
1 decimal constant is so large that it is unsigned