This is the mail archive of the gcc-testresults@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]

Results for 2.97 20001023 (experimental) testsuite on alpha-dec-osf4.0e


Native configuration is alpha-dec-osf4.0e

		=== libio tests ===


Running target unix

		=== libio Summary ===

# of expected passes		40
		=== libstdc++ tests ===


Running target unix

		=== libstdc++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		30
		=== gcc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001009-2.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20001011-1.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/20000320-1.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-2.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops -finline-functions 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/fp-cmp-4.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution,  -O0 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution,  -O1 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution,  -O2 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution,  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution,  -O3 -g 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution,  -O3 -fssa 
FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/mzero2.c execution,  -Os 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution,  -O0 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution,  -O1 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution,  -O2 
XPASS: gcc.c-torture/execute/memcheck/blkarg.c execution,  -Os 
FAIL: gcc.dg/20000419-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/asm-fs-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-array-nonobj-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-printf-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/c99-scanf-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c bogus sequence point warning (test for bogus messages, line 49)
FAIL: gcc.dg/sequence-pt-1.c (test for excess errors)

		=== gcc Summary ===

# of expected passes		14120
# of unexpected failures	62
# of unexpected successes	4
# of expected failures		80
# of unresolved testcases	3
# of unsupported tests		50
/user/rand/rdb/src/egcs-20001023.chk/gcc/xgcc version 2.97 20001023 (experimental)

		=== g++ tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: g++.eh/badalloc1.C  Execution test
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 18)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate1.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 20)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate2.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 16)
FAIL: g++.ext/instantiate3.C not instantiated (test for errors, line 13)
FAIL: g++.other/crash18.C (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.other/loop2.C caused compiler crash
FAIL: g++.pt/static8.C (test for excess errors)

		=== g++ Summary ===

# of expected passes		6025
# of unexpected failures	8
# of expected failures		99
# of untested testcases		18
/user/rand/rdb/src/egcs-20001023.chk/gcc/testsuite/../g++ version 2.97 20001023 (experimental)

		=== g77 tests ===


Running target unix

		=== g77 Summary ===

# of expected passes		992
		=== objc tests ===


Running target unix
FAIL: objc/execute/np-1.m compilation,  -O 
FAIL: objc/execute/np-2.m compilation,  -O 

		=== objc Summary ===

# of expected passes		44
# of unexpected failures	2
# of untested testcases		2
/user/rand/rdb/src/egcs-20001023.chk/gcc/xgcc version 2.97 20001023 (experimental)


Compiler version: 2.97 20001023 (experimental) 
Platform: alpha-dec-osf4.0e
configure flags: --host=alpha-dec-osf4.0e --enable-checking
Counting all warnings,
there are 242 warnings in stage3 of this bootstrap.

Number of warnings per file:
 106 ../../egcs-20001023/include/getopt.h
  22 ../../../egcs-20001023/gcc/f/target.c
  18 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/cpphash.h
  16 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/mips-tfile.c
   9 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/reload.c
   8 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/libgcc2.c
   6 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/gcc.c
   6 ../../../egcs-20001023/gcc/f/expr.c
   5 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/loop.c
   5 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/cse.c
   5 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/c-common.c
   5 ../../../egcs-20001023/gcc/cp/error.c
   4 obstack.c
   4 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/cpplex.c
   2 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/expr.c
   2 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/cppinit.c
   2 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/config/alpha/alpha.c
   2 ../../../egcs-20001023/gcc/java/jcf-write.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/sdbout.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/regclass.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/objc/objc-parse.y
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/mips-tdump.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/java/jvspec.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/haifa-sched.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/fold-const.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/final.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/f/lang-specs.h
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/cppexp.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/combine.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/collect2.c
   1 ../../egcs-20001023/gcc/c-parse.y
   1 ../../../egcs-20001023/gcc/cp/search.c
   1 ../../../egcs-20001023/gcc/cp/errfn.c

Number of warning types:
 114 function declaration isn't a prototype
  29 value computed is not used
  24 traditional C rejects the 'u' suffix
  18 comparison between signed and unsigned
  11 \`???' might be used uninitialized in this function
   8 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
   7 large integer implicitly truncated to unsigned type
   7 ??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)
   5 initialization from incompatible pointer type
   4 implicit declaration of function \`???'
   3 string length \`???' is greater than the minimum length \`???' ISO C89 is required to support
   2 width of integer constant changes with -traditional
   2 no previous prototype for \`???'
   2 assignment from incompatible pointer type
   1 unused variable \`???'
   1 pointer targets in passing arg ??? of \`???' differ in signedness
   1 missing initializer
   1 assignment discards qualifiers from pointer target type
   1 \`long' switch expression not converted to \`int' in ISO C
   1 (near initialization for \`???')

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]