This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Regressions on trunk at revision 199531 vs revision 199475
- From: intel64profiled at gnu-mic-1 dot sc dot intel dot com (H.J. Lu (Intel64 LTO/FDO))
- To: hjl dot tools at gmail dot com, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 07:22:54 -0700
- Subject: Regressions on trunk at revision 199531 vs revision 199475
New failures:
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-2.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI <[pb]" 1
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-2.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI <[pb]" 1
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-2.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI <[pb]" 1
FAIL: g++.dg/tree-ssa/ivopts-2.C -std=gnu++98 scan-tree-dump-times ivopts "PHI <[pb]" 1
FAIL: gfortran.dg/power_6.f90 -O scan-tree-dump optimized "powi_[0-9] = powi_cond_[0-9] \\? -1.0e\\+0 : 1.0e\\+0;"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/power_6.f90 -O scan-tree-dump optimized "powi_[0-9] = powi_cond_[0-9] \\? -1.0e\\+0 : 1.0e\\+0;"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/power_6.f90 -O scan-tree-dump optimized "powi_cond_[0-9] = k_[0-9]\\(D\\) & 1;"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/power_6.f90 -O scan-tree-dump optimized "powi_cond_[0-9] = k_[0-9]\\(D\\) & 1;"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/power_6.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-not optimized "__builtin_powif"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/power_6.f90 -O scan-tree-dump-not optimized "__builtin_powif"
New passes: