This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 51 GCC HEAD regressions, 40 new, with your patch on 2005-10-14T21:55:43Z.

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at suse dot de>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, nathan at codesourcery dot com, reichelt at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de, per at bothner dot com, jakub at redhat dot com
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 10:29:10 -0700
Subject: Re: 51 GCC HEAD regressions, 40 new, with your patch on 2005-10-14T21:55:43Z.
References: <20051015154535.480EC1AD88E1F@gcc-regress.apple.com> <05d6421576d5544e087548ddd5351cd7@physics.uc.edu> <43514838.9000900@suse.de>

Paolo Carlini wrote:

> Will look into it, maybe a #pragma GCC system_header is missing and the
> warning was wrongly not emitted because of the bug...

If that is not the problem, let me know, and I will investigate.

(You could of course do this portably by using template specializations
based on the size of size_t;

  template <>
  struct __the_value<8> {
    static const long long = ...;
  }

and so forth....)

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery, LLC
mark@codesourcery.com
(916) 791-8304

References:
- 51 GCC HEAD regressions, 40 new, with your patch on 2005-10-14T21:55:43Z.
  - From: GCC regression checker
- Re: 51 GCC HEAD regressions, 40 new, with your patch on 2005-10-14T21:55:43Z.
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: 51 GCC HEAD regressions, 40 new, with your patch on 2005-10-14T21:55:43Z.
  - From: Paolo Carlini

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]