This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 2 GCC HEAD regressions, 1 new, with your patch on 2005-01-13T05:24:12Z.


"GCC regression checker" <geoffk@apple.com> writes:

> With your recent patch, GCC HEAD has some regression test failures, 
> which used to pass.  There are 1 new failures, and 1
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
> 
> The new failures are:
> native libjava.sum PR18699

Surely this is due to one of these:

> --- /Users/regress/tbox/changelog_mail/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog	Wed Jan 12 10:46:56 2005
> +++ gcc/gcc/ChangeLog	Wed Jan 12 21:25:19 2005
> @@ -1,3 +1,22 @@
> +2005-01-13  Hans-Peter Nilsson  <hp@bitrange.com>
> +
> +	PR target/18329
> +	PR target/18330
> +	* reload1.c (delete_output_reload): Don't delete an output reload
> +	if the pseudo lives longer than a single basic block.  Adjust and
> +	improve wording of comment.
> +
> +2005-01-12  Andrew Pinski  <pinskia@physics.uc.edu>
> +
> +	PR target/19334
> +	* config/darwin.c (machopic_select_section): Use TYPE_SIZE_UNIT instead
> +	of TYPE_SIZE where we mean the number of bytes.
> +
> +2005-01-12  Aldy Hernandez  <aldyh@redhat.com>
> +
> +	* function.c (assign_parm_setup_block): Relax condition on
> +	multi-register optimization.
> +


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]