Re: new FAILs on HEAD

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>]

On Oct 14, 2004, at 11:00 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

> On Oct 14, 2004, at 10:30 PM, Michael Ritzert wrote:
>
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-2.c execution,  -O2
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-2.c execution,  -O3 
> > -fomit-frame-pointer
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strlen-2.c execution,  -O3 -g
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strpcpy.c execution,  -O1
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strpcpy.c execution,  -O2
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strpcpy.c execution,  -O3 
> > -fomit-frame-pointer
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strpcpy.c execution,  -O3 -g
> > FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strpcpy.c execution,  -Os
>
>
> These are mine for sure.
>
> I think this one is mine also:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20031022-1.c scan-tree-dump-times 
> entry_exit_blocks.1..pred 1
>
> And maybe this one:
> FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/vect-73.c scan-tree-dump-times vectorized 1 loops 1
>
> They are all related to gimplifier does not fold &a[0]+1 or does some
> weird thing to it.
>
> These are all missed-optimization and nothing more (not wrong-code).

I reverted the patch which caused the problem.

Thanks,
Andrew Pinski