This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Regression for trunk on i686-pc-linux-gnu


81 new FAIL's (94 total) have appeared for i686-pc-linux-gnu:
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sbumpc/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sbumpc/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sbumpc/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sbumpc/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sbumpc/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sbumpc/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekoff/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/seekpos/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetc/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetc/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetc/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetc/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetc/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetc/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetn/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetn/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetn/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetn/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetn/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sgetn/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/snextc/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/snextc/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/snextc/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/snextc/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/snextc/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/snextc/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputbackc/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputbackc/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputbackc/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputbackc/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputbackc/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputbackc/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputc/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputc/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputc/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputc/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputc/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputc/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputn/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputn/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputn/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputn/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputn/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sputn/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sungetc/char/1-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sungetc/char/1-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sungetc/char/1-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sungetc/char/2-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sungetc/char/2-io.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_filebuf/sungetc/char/2-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_istream/exceptions/char/9561.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/exceptions_badbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_arithmetic/char/exceptions_failbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_other/char/9424-in.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_other/char/error_failbit.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_other/char/exceptions_badbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_istream/extractors_other/char/exceptions_failbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_istream/seekg/char/exceptions_badbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_istream/tellg/char/exceptions_badbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/flush/char/2.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/flush/char/exceptions_badbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_arithmetic/char/exceptions_badbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_arithmetic/char/exceptions_failbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_other/char/4.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_other/char/5.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_other/char/9424-out.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_other/char/error_failbit.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_other/char/exceptions_badbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/inserters_other/char/exceptions_failbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/seekp/char/exceptions_badbit_throw.cc
    libstdc++.sum 27_io/basic_ostream/tellp/char/exceptions_badbit_throw.cc
These tests passed the last time they were ran.

Attached are the ChangeLogs since the previous run.  Possibly a patch with
your name on it has caused the problem(s).


The full transcript is at http://www.devphil.com/build/
Specific problem logs at http://www.devphil.com/build/reports/tests-trunk/
(explanations of each file are on the main page; you probably want summary*)

Host was an athlon-xp (i686) system.  Target was specified as i686-pc-linux-gnu.

This particular run used standard (previously installed) binutils.

This email is generated by a machine, not sent from a person.  If you think
it's been sent to you in error, please see the gcc-regression list archives
for possible followup discussion; this could be legitimate or it could be a
false positive.  Also watch for email from the other regression testers and
check the logs from the known autobuilders.

If you write a response, please respect the Reply-To: header.


With love,
The Autocrasher (Phil's Builder Bot, version 2.1)

=========================================================================

Attachment: changelog_diff.txt
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]