Re: 4 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-10-04T03:47:26Z.

[Robert Bowdidge <bowdidge at apple dot com>]

vla1.c, 20000412-3.c, and asm-names.c all failed in the test suite run 
I did before I applied my changes.  I assume these regressions were 
caused by code checked in before my patch.

I didn't test Fortran, so I wouldn't have noticed 980520-1.f

Robert

On Oct 4, 2003, at 4:40 AM, GCC regression checker wrote:

> With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> used to pass.  There are 0 new failures, and 4
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
>
> The old failures, which were not fixed or introduced by your patch, 
> are:
> native g++.sum g++.dg/ext/vla1.C
> native g77.sum g77.f-torture/execute/980520-1.f
> native gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/20000412-3.c
> native gcc.sum gcc.dg/asm-names.c
>
> For more information, see http://gcc.gnu.org/regtest/.
> <ChangeLog.diff>--
> Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@apple.com>
> (via an automated GCC regression-testing script.)