This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-09-05T03:11:17Z.
- From: Robert Millan <zeratul2 at wanadoo dot es>
- To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: GCC regression checker <geoffk at apple dot com>, austern at apple dot com,dj at redhat dot com, jsturm at one-point dot com, ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE,robertmh at gnu dot org, rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:12:01 +0000
- Subject: Re: 3 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2003-09-05T03:11:17Z.
- Organisation: free as in freedom
- References: <200309051102.h85B2Puv006020@gcc-regress.apple.com>
Hello,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:02:23AM +0000, GCC regression checker wrote:
> With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> used to pass. There are 0 new failures, and 3
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 31 failures
> have been fixed.
>
> [..]
>
> +2003-09-04 Robert Millan <robertmh@gnu.org>
> +
> + * configure.in: Match GNU/KFreeBSD with new kfreebsd*-gnu triplet.
> +
I can assure you that my changes didn't cause a regression, they're only
relevant to the GNU/KFreeBSD system.
Asides from this, from a lecture of the report it seems the script
missidentified a bunch of bug fixes with regression (0 new failures)
--
Robert Millan
"[..] but the delight and pride of Aule is in the deed of making, and in the
thing made, and neither in possession nor in his own mastery; wherefore he
gives and hoards not, and is free from care, passing ever on to some new work."
-- J.R.R.T, Ainulindale (Silmarillion)