This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2003-06-22T16:46:20Z.

From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
To: Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>,gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, kazu at cs dot umass dot edu,neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk, rearnsha at arm dot com
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2003 19:56:52 +0200
Subject: Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2003-06-22T16:46:20Z.
References: <AC8B66DE-A4D7-11D7-AD8C-000393A6D2F2@physics.uc.edu><u8ptl6uhp9.fsf@gromit.moeb> <874r2if16p.fsf@egil.codesourcery.com>

Zack Weinberg <zack@codesourcery.com> writes:

> Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.de> writes:
>
>> Just fixed and committed - sorry, my patch somehow lost two unused
>> attributes and my own tests didn't hit this :-(
>
> protoize silently throws away ATTRIBUTE_* on K+R parameter
> declarations.

I know - and added some but somehow only 3 out of 5 for one function
with lots of parameters :-(

Somebody should teach protoize about attribute...

Andreas
-- 
 Andreas Jaeger, SuSE Linux AG, aj@suse.de, http://www.suse.de/~aj
  GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on 2003-06-22T16:46:20Z.
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2003-06-22T16:46:20Z.
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: GCC build failed for native with your patch on2003-06-22T16:46:20Z.
  - From: Zack Weinberg

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]