This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: 1894 GCC regressions, 1878 new, with your patch on2002-07-24T18:30:44Z.


> From: cgd@broadcom.com
> Date: 24 Jul 2002 15:06:48 -0700

> At Wed, 24 Jul 2002 21:38:18 +0000, GCC regression checker wrote:
> > With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> > used to pass.  There are 1878 new failures, and 16
> > failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> > have been fixed.
> 
> "D'oh!"
> 
> These are mine; libgloss will need to be updated (after the patch in
> 
> 	http://sources.redhat.com/ml/newlib/2002/msg00362.html
> 
> is applied to newlib; hopefully today), and then mips will go back to
> working.

The problem with that is that the tester won't update its binutils or
newlib unless the tree has no regressions, because otherwise it can't
tell if it's updating to a broken binutils or newlib.  In addition, it
can't upgrade right now anyway because gdb introduces new regressions.
So, can you add some backwards-compatibility for old newlibs?

-- 
- Geoffrey Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org> <geoffk@redhat.com>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]