This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

6 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-25T17:09:57Z.

From: "GCC regression checker" <regress at redhat dot com>
To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
Cc: jessica at cup dot hp dot com
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2002 20:38:03 +0000
Subject: 6 GCC regressions, 0 new, with your patch on 2002-06-25T17:09:57Z.
Reply-to: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org

With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
used to pass.  There are 0 new failures, and 6
failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
have been fixed.

The old failures, which were not fixed or introduced by your patch, are:
powerpc-eabisim g77.sum g77.f-torture/execute/f90-intrinsic-bit.f
powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/20020108-1.c
powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-prefetch-2.c
powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-prefetch-3.c
powerpc-eabisim gcc.sum gcc.c-torture/execute/builtin-prefetch-4.c
native g77.sum g77.f-torture/execute/f90-intrinsic-bit.f

For more information, see <http://people.redhat.com/geoffk/gcc-regression/>.

Attachment: ChangeLog.diff
Description: Text document

-- 
Geoffrey Keating <regress@redhat.com> 
(via an automated GCC regression-testing script.)

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]