This is the mail archive of the gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 31 GCC regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2002-05-22T05:55:52Z.

From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
To: Bruce Korb <bkorb at pacbell dot net>
Cc: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org, bkorb at gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 22:53:37 +0100
Subject: Re: 31 GCC regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2002-05-22T05:55:52Z.
References: <200205220941.g4M9fkv32691@maat.sfbay.redhat.com> <3CEBA612.D3E75D92@pacbell.net>

Bruce Korb wrote:-

> 
> Hi Geoff,
> 
> Nice message!  I like the reworking (since I last received one).
> 
> Neil,
> 
> I think it safe to say these are related to your changes.... :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Bruce

Yah, my patch altered the compiler to exit immediately if an error
is encountered during the period until switch processing has
finished.

I think the testcase in question tests for two diagnostics, one
before and one after option processing, and it no longer gets
the latter.

IOW I think the testcase should be fixed.  I noticed this in
my local bootstrap, but couldn't convince myself it was my
patch since it didn't occur 6 times it looked more like
an optimization issue.  (My patch was truly trivial).

I'll look in detail at the test soon.

Neil.

References:
- 31 GCC regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2002-05-22T05:55:52Z.
  - From: GCC regression checker
- Re: 31 GCC regressions, 4 new, with your patch on 2002-05-22T05:55:52Z.
  - From: Bruce Korb

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]