This is the mail archive of the
gcc-regression@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: 3 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-03-28T00:20:34Z.
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- To: gcc-regression at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Cc: amodra at bigpond dot net dot au, jh at suse dot cz, rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz,ro at TechFak dot Uni-Bielefeld dot DE, schwab at suse dot de, tromey at redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 06:55:57 +0000
- Subject: Re: 3 GCC regressions, 2 new, with your patch on 2002-03-28T00:20:34Z.
- References: <200203280258.g2S2wCX08582@maat.cygnus.com>
GCC regression checker wrote:-
> With your recent patch, GCC has some regression test failures, which
> used to pass. There are 2 new failures, and 1
> failures that existed before and after that patch; 0 failures
> have been fixed.
>
> The new failures are:
> powerpc-eabisim gdb.sum gdb.base/funcargs.exp:
> powerpc-eabisim gdb.sum gdb.c++/ovldbreak.exp:
Anyone claiming these? I don't *think* they're mine, but I'm not
100% sure.
Neil.