This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH 2/2] gcc/riscv: Add a mechanism to remove some calls to _riscv_save_0
On Aug 30 2019, Jim Wilson <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> produced shared libraries that failed again, which turned out because
> the save/restore functions use the alternate link register t0/x5 which
> is clobbered by plts, so we can't call them in shared libraries at
Shouldn't the save/restore functions always be local to the object, thus
never be called through the PLT?
Andreas Schwab, email@example.com
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."