This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [PATCH V2 6/8] bpf: adjust GCC testsuite to eBPF limitations
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 07:33:20PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 8/16/19 6:50 PM, Jose E. Marchesi wrote:
> So I think we probably want an effective target check for indirect calls
> rather than checking explicitly for ebpf in all these files.
> It also seems like rather than checking for ebpf on files with large
> stacks, we should be using the generic mechanisms to defined the allowed
> size of the stack (mentioned in prior review) & mark test which use too
> much space. This would almost certainly help other embedded targets as
> Not sure the best way to deal with too many arguments. I suspect we
> want an efffective target check for that. Keeping this up-to-date will
> be painful as people write more tests.
You could add a command line option to *allow* many args. You wouldn't
use that in the kernel, but it helps (compiler) testing a lot.
You could do something similar for indirect jumps, and bigger stack size,