This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Prevent LTO section collision for a symbol name starting with '*'.

From: Martin Liška <mliska at suse dot cz>
To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 12:43:12 +0200
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent LTO section collision for a symbol name starting with '*'.
References: <55b4acda-9673-557b-5819-50bff07fa095@suse.cz> <CAFiYyc25R6e5R78HXtLh-tu4BVWmkEi_JwEs0AgO9XVm=0dBdA@mail.gmail.com> <0e977dd4-c9ff-ed24-fbe0-fa6993a9a14e@suse.cz> <CAFiYyc0D1rCxFLKw9k3Ug0zDxKTSqnWjbcVedKSKnqg6dYL2hA@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/12/19 12:39 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> which is the "other" body for 'open' but it shouldn't really be output
> to the symbol table.  Still we want to emit its body for the purpose
> of inlining.  So IMHO the fix is not to do magic '0' appending for
> the user-asm-name case but instead "mangling" of extern inline
> bodies because those are the speciality causing the issue in the end.

Ok, so please advise me how can we achieve that?

Martin

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent LTO section collision for a symbol name starting with '*'.
  - From: Richard Biener

References:
- [PATCH] Prevent LTO section collision for a symbol name starting with '*'.
  - From: Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent LTO section collision for a symbol name starting with '*'.
  - From: Richard Biener
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent LTO section collision for a symbol name starting with '*'.
  - From: Martin Liška
- Re: [PATCH] Prevent LTO section collision for a symbol name starting with '*'.
  - From: Richard Biener

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]