This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH][RFC][x86] Fix PR91154, add SImode smax, allow SImode add in SSE regs

On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Uros Bizjak wrote:

> > dimode_{scalar_to_vector_candidate_p,remove_non_convertible_regs}
> > functions to drop the dimode_ prefix - is that OK or do you
> > prefer some other prefix?
> 
> No, please just drop the prefix.

just noticed this applies to the derived dimode_scalar_chain class
as well where I can't simply drop the prefix.  So would
general_scalar_chain / 
general_{scalar_to_vector_candidate_p,remove_non_convertible_regs}
be OK?

Richard.
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]