This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Contrib PATCH] Add scripts to convert GCC repo from SVN to Git
> On Aug 2, 2019, at 2:06 PM, Richard Biener <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 1:01 PM Martin Liška <email@example.com> wrote:
>> On 8/2/19 12:54 PM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>>> On Aug 2, 2019, at 1:26 PM, Martin Liška <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>>>> On 8/2/19 10:41 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>>>>> In the end, I don't care much to which version of the repo we switch, as long as we switch.
>>>> Hi Maxim.
>>>> I really appreciate that you've been working on that. Same as you I would like to see
>>>> any change that will lead to a git repository.
>>>> I have couple of questions about the upcoming Cauldron:
>>>> - Are you planning to attend?
>>> Unfortunately, I won't attend this time.
>> I see.
>>>> - Would it be possible to prepare a voting during e.g. Steering Committee where
>>>> we'll vote about transition options?
>>>> - Would it make sense to do an online questionnaire in advance in order
>>>> to guess what's prevailing opinion?
>>>> If you are interested, I can help you?
>>> Let's organize an online survey now. While most active GCC developers will attend Cauldron, many others will not, so we shouldn't rely on Cauldron to make any final decisions.
>> Sure, online is the best option as all active community members can vote.
>>> Martin, would you please organize the survey?
>> Yes, but I haven't followed the discussion in recent weeks. Is the only question
>> whether we want the current GIT mirror or your rebased git repository?
>> Is Eric Raymond's transition still in play or not?
> 1) Stay with SVN
> 2) Switch to the existing GIT mirror
> 3) Wait for ERS to complete his conversion to GIT
> 4) Use the existing new conversion to GIT fixing authors and commit messages
> 5) I don't care
> 6) I don't care as long as we switch to GIT
>> Are there any other sub-question regarding commit message format, git hooks, etc.
>> that will deserve a place in the questionnaire?
> No, please do not make it unnecessarily complicated. Maybe the questionaire
> can include a free-form text field for more comments.
> Btw, I do not believe we should do this kind of voting. Who's eligible to vote?
> Is the vote anonymous? What happens when the majority (what is the majority?)
> votes for option N?
> IMHO voting is bike-shedding.
> Those who do the work decide. _They_ may ask questions _and_ decide whether
> to listen to the answer.
I think we should do a /survey/, not organize a vote. From reading this thread an independent observer will get an impression that GCC developers are split into 3 roughly equal parts:
1. those who prefer switch to existing mirror,
2. those who prefer to wait for reposurgeon conversion,
3. those who prefer to switch to svn-git conversion with authors fixed.
The survey might show that we have a clear majority for one of the options, and that we can conclude the discussion. If survey shows that we don't have a clear winner, then let's continue the discussion.
IMO, anyone who considers himself or herself a GCC developer should participate and survey should not be anonymous to avoid abuse.