This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] PR91195: fix -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning for conditional store optimization


This patch is to fix PR91195. Is it OK for trunk?

diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 711a31ea597..4db36644160 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2019-07-22  Jiangning Liu  <jiangning.liu@amperecomputing.com>
+
+	PR middle-end/91195
+	* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (cond_store_replacement): Work around
+	-Wmaybe-uninitialized warning.
+
 2019-07-22  Stafford Horne  <shorne@gmail.com>
 
 	* config/or1k/or1k.c (or1k_expand_compare): Check for int before
diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c b/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c
index b64bde695f4..7a86007d087 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-phiopt.c
@@ -2240,6 +2240,14 @@ cond_store_replacement (basic_block middle_bb, basic_block join_bb,
       tree base = get_base_address (lhs);
       if (!auto_var_p (base) || TREE_ADDRESSABLE (base))
 	return false;
+
+      /* The transformation below will inherently introduce a memory load,
+	 for which LHS may not be initialized yet if it is not in NOTRAP,
+	 so a -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning message could be triggered.
+	 Since it's a bit hard to have a very accurate uninitialization
+	 analysis to memory reference, we disable the warning here to avoid
+	 confusion.  */
+      TREE_NO_WARNING (lhs) = 1;
     }
 
   /* Now we've checked the constraints, so do the transformation:

Thanks,
-Jiangning


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]