This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[PATCH] Check requested alignment in SET_{DECL,TYPE}_ALIGN is pow2_or_zerop before aligning on targets with partial int modes


There have been some ICEs in the past for msp430-elf with the large
memory model (20-bit pointers), caused by SET_{DECL,TYPE}_ALIGN being called
with an argument which resolves to 20 i.e. POINTER_SIZE,
or the default value of TARGET_VTABLE_ENTRY_ALIGN (which is POINTER_SIZE).

The attached patch adds an assertion that SET_{DECL,TYPE}_ALIGN is called with
a value which is a power of 2, or 0, for targets which support a partial int
mode. This should catch issues in the future with non-power of 2
alignments being set, which could propagate into serious problems later in the
compilation process.

If the filtering to only perform this check for targets supporting a partial
int mode is unnecessary, I can remove that so CHECK_POW2_OR_ZEROP always
expands to check_pow2_or_zerop.

Successfully bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and
msp430-elf/-mlarge.

Ok for trunk, or does this have to wait for GCC10 Stage 1?
>From b44723988dfb0bb9e8c647dd86aeba762ebdf84d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jozef Lawrynowicz <jozef.l@mittosystems.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2018 11:14:35 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Check requested alignment in SET_{DECL,TYPE}_ALIGN is
 pow2_or_zerop before aligning on targets with partial int modes

2018-12-30  Jozef Lawrynowicz  <jozef.l@mittosystems.com>

	gcc/ChangeLog:

	* tree.h (check_pow2_or_zerop): New.
	(CHECK_POW2_OR_ZEROP): New.
	(SET_TYPE_ALIGN): Call CHECK_POW2_OR_ZEROP before setting alignment.
	(SET_DECL_ALIGN): Call CHECK_POW2_OR_ZEROP before setting alignment.
---
 gcc/tree.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/tree.h b/gcc/tree.h
index ed37e54..e1188b7 100644
--- a/gcc/tree.h
+++ b/gcc/tree.h
@@ -74,6 +74,27 @@ as_internal_fn (combined_fn code)
   return internal_fn (int (code) - int (END_BUILTINS));
 }
 
+/* Historically there have been attempts to call SET_DECL/TYPE_ALIGN with
+   POINTER_SIZE as the alignment.  Alignment is expected to always be a power
+   of 2, so aligning to POINTER_SIZE on targets that use a partial integer
+   mode for pointers will cause problems.
+   So for targets that support a partial integer mode, check the requested
+   alignment is 0 or a power of 2 before aligning.  */
+#if defined(HAVE_PQImode) || defined(HAVE_PHImode) \
+  || defined(HAVE_PSImode) || defined(HAVE_PDImode)
+inline HOST_WIDE_INT
+check_pow2_or_zerop (HOST_WIDE_INT x)
+{
+  gcc_assert (pow2_or_zerop (x));
+  return x;
+}
+
+#define CHECK_POW2_OR_ZEROP(X) check_pow2_or_zerop (X)
+
+#else /* !defined(HAVE_P{Q,H,S,D}Imode) */
+#define CHECK_POW2_OR_ZEROP(X) X
+#endif
+
 /* Macros for initializing `tree_contains_struct'.  */
 #define MARK_TS_BASE(C)					\
   (tree_contains_struct[C][TS_BASE] = true)
@@ -1993,7 +2014,7 @@ extern machine_mode vector_type_mode (const_tree);
 
 /* Specify that TYPE_ALIGN(NODE) is X.  */
 #define SET_TYPE_ALIGN(NODE, X) \
-    (TYPE_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.align = ffs_hwi (X))
+    (TYPE_CHECK (NODE)->type_common.align = ffs_hwi (CHECK_POW2_OR_ZEROP (X)))
 
 /* 1 if the alignment for this type was requested by "aligned" attribute,
    0 if it is the default for this type.  */
@@ -2444,7 +2465,8 @@ extern machine_mode vector_type_mode (const_tree);
      ? ((unsigned)1) << ((NODE)->decl_common.align - 1) : 0)
 /* Specify that DECL_ALIGN(NODE) is X.  */
 #define SET_DECL_ALIGN(NODE, X) \
-    (DECL_COMMON_CHECK (NODE)->decl_common.align = ffs_hwi (X))
+    (DECL_COMMON_CHECK (NODE)->decl_common.align \
+     = ffs_hwi (CHECK_POW2_OR_ZEROP (X)))
 
 /* The minimum alignment necessary for the datum, in bits, without
    warning.  */
-- 
2.7.4


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]