This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] detect missing nuls in address of const char (PR 87756)


Rainer Orth <ro@CeBiTec.Uni-Bielefeld.DE> writes:

> Hi Martin,
>
>> On 11/26/18 10:52 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>>> I have now committed this patch as r266418.
>>>
>>> this patch has created a bunch of XPASSes everywhere:
>>>
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 119)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-fprintf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 120)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 116)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 117)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/builtin-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for
>>> warnings, line 84)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/user-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for warnings,
>>> line 110)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/user-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for warnings,
>>> line 142)
>>> +XPASS: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/user-printf-warn-1.c pr87756 (test for warnings,
>>> line 143)
>>
>> Thanks for the heads up.  I like those much better than FAILs :)
>
> fully agreed ;-)  However, at some point too many XFAILs make the real
                                                    XPASSes, of course...

> problems harder to spot in mail-report.log...

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]