This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Free more of type decls
- From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
- To: Richard Biener <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, Richard Guenther <rguenther at suse dot de>
- Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2018 11:37:38 +0200
- Subject: Re: Free more of type decls
- References: <20181026071153.GB42273@kam.mff.cuni.cz> <CAFiYyc3p+H_M0Awcguxo0NbGoX=P=fx6G9jg9-AH153G32G6Tw@mail.gmail.com>
> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 9:12 AM Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> > this patch frees TYPE_DECL and alignment from TYPE_DECL and also preserves
> > only those TYPE_DECL pointers that are actually used to build ODR type tree.
> >
> > It reduces number of TYPE_DECLs streamed from WPA to ltrans to about 20%
> > and is important for the patch turning types to incomplete types. Without
> > this change the TREE_TYPE of TYPE_DECL would still point back to complete type
> > and duplicating TYPE_DECLs as well is somewhat laborious.
>
> So the following is the really important hunk, correct?
>
> > @@ -5174,7 +5174,7 @@ free_lang_data_in_type (tree type)
> >
> > /* Drop TYPE_DECLs in TYPE_NAME in favor of the identifier in the
> > TYPE_DECL if the type doesn't have linkage. */
> > - if (! type_with_linkage_p (type))
> > + if (type != TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (type) || ! type_with_linkage_p (type))
> > {
> > TYPE_NAME (type) = TYPE_IDENTIFIER (type);
> > TYPE_STUB_DECL (type) = NULL;
>
> Can you explain why you "free" alignment of TYPE_DECLs? It's just some
> bits... does the FE somehow re-use those for sth else? I wouldn't have
> expected those to be set to anything meaningful.
It is set to 1 for forward declarations and 8 for fully defined types.
Once I start to turn complete types into incomplete they would not match
becaue of this difference.
>
> I'm not too comfortable with setting TREE_TYPE of a TYPE_DECL to NULL.
> Can we instead use void_type_node? The tree-inline.c hunk should
> probably test whether DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE is non-null instead.
void_type_node works too. I wanted to put in something that will make any
code that relies on it to crash (so I am sure there is none).
Does the following variant look OK?
I am re-testing it.
* tree.c (free_lang_data_in_decl): Clear alignment and TREE_TYPE
of TYPE_DECL.
Index: tree.c
===================================================================
--- tree.c (revision 265522)
+++ tree.c (working copy)
@@ -5354,6 +5354,10 @@ free_lang_data_in_decl (tree decl)
DECL_VISIBILITY_SPECIFIED (decl) = 0;
DECL_INITIAL (decl) = NULL_TREE;
DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE (decl) = NULL_TREE;
+ /* Make sure that complete and incomplete types have same TYPE_DECL.
+ C++ produces different DECL_ALIGN for them. */
+ SET_DECL_ALIGN (decl, 0);
+ TREE_TYPE (decl) = void_type_node;
}
else if (TREE_CODE (decl) == FIELD_DECL)
DECL_INITIAL (decl) = NULL_TREE;