This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Come up with gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/i386.dg and move there some tests.


On 10/12/18 10:20 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Hi Martin,
> 
>> On 10/9/18 11:03 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Hi Martin,
>>>
>>>> rename from gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/pr82625.C
>>>> rename to gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr82625.C
>>>> index 59b174f8c51..0eb70baed5e 100644
>>>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/pr82625.C
>>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.target/i386/pr82625.C
>>>> @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
>>>>  /* { dg-do compile } */
>>>>  /* { dg-require-ifunc "" } */
>>>>  /* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-tree-optimized" } */
>>>> -/* { dg-do compile { target i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } } */
>>>> +/* { dg-do compile } */
>>>
>>> this is wrong: two instances of dg-do and dg-do after target selections
>>> don't play well with one another.  When you added it yesterday, you
>>> badly broke the test on all x86 targets without ifunc support (probably
>>> everything non-Linux):
>>>
>>> +UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/ext/pr82625.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times
>>> optimized "return 4096;" 1
>>> +UNRESOLVED: g++.dg/ext/pr82625.C -std=gnu++11 scan-tree-dump-times
>>> optimized "return 8192;" 1
>>> +FAIL: g++.dg/ext/pr82625.C  -std=gnu++11 (test for excess errors)
>>>
>>> Excess errors:
>>> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/pr82625.C:7:17:
>>> error: multiversioning needs ifunc which is not supported on this target
>>> /vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/ext/pr82625.C:24:1:
>>> error: use of multiversioned function without a default
>>>
>>> Just remove the second dg-do line.
>>
>> Thanks for testing!
>>
>> I'm sending updated version of the patch.
> 
> I noticed that before the tests were run with all of
> -std=(c|gnu)++(98|11|14), now with no explict -std option.  I wonder if
> this is an issue.
> 
> 	Rainer
> 

Hello.

I guess that should not be a problem.

Martin


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]