On 20/09/18 15:36 +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 at 23:13, Rainer Orth <ro@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Christophe,
>>
>> > I have noticed failures on hypot-long-double.cc on arm, so I suggest we add:
>> >
>> > diff --git
>> > a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
>> > b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
>> > index 8a05473..4c2e33b 100644
>> > --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
>> > +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/26_numerics/headers/cmath/hypot-long-double.cc
>> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>> >
>> > // { dg-options "-std=gnu++17" }
>> > // { dg-do run { target c++17 } }
>> > -// { dg-xfail-run-if "PR 78179" { powerpc-ibm-aix* hppa-*-linux* nios2-*-* } }
>> > +// { dg-xfail-run-if "PR 78179" { powerpc-ibm-aix* hppa-*-linux*
>> > nios2-*-* arm*-*-* } }
>> >
>> > // Run the long double tests from hypot.cc separately, because they fail on a
>> > // number of targets. See PR libstdc++/78179 for details.
>> >
>> > OK?
>>
>> just a nit (and not a review): I'd prefer the target list to be sorted
>> alphabetically, not completely random.
>>
>
>Sure, I can sort the whole list, if OK on principle.
Yes, please go ahead and commit it with the sorted list.