This is the mail archive of the
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[Patch, Fortran] PR 86830: [8/9 Regression] Contiguous array pointer function result not recognized as contiguous
- From: Janus Weil <janus at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: gfortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2018 22:34:59 +0200
- Subject: [Patch, Fortran] PR 86830: [8/9 Regression] Contiguous array pointer function result not recognized as contiguous
Hi all,
the attached patch fixes a rejects-valid regression, where a
type-bound procedure call was not correctly detected to have a
contiguous result. The patch is functionally identical with comment #2
in the PR, with a little bit of cleanup on top of it. It regtests
cleanly on x86_64-linux-gnu. Ok for trunk and gcc-8-branch?
Cheers,
Janus
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
index 7cfb94ee115..7e2d6445237 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2018-09-09 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/86830
+ * expr.c (gfc_is_simply_contiguous): Handle type-bound procedure calls
+ with non-polymorphic objects.
+
2018-09-03 Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle@gcc.gnu.org>
* simplify.c (gfc_simplify_modulo): Re-arrange code to test whether
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/expr.c b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
index c5bf822cd24..97792fe32a7 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/expr.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/expr.c
@@ -5385,16 +5385,13 @@ gfc_is_simply_contiguous (gfc_expr *expr, bool strict, bool permit_element)
return expr->value.function.esym->result->attr.contiguous;
else
{
- /* We have to jump through some hoops if this is a vtab entry. */
- gfc_symbol *s;
- gfc_ref *r, *rc;
-
- s = expr->symtree->n.sym;
- if (s->ts.type != BT_CLASS)
+ /* Type-bound procedures. */
+ gfc_symbol *s = expr->symtree->n.sym;
+ if (s->ts.type != BT_CLASS && s->ts.type != BT_DERIVED)
return false;
- rc = NULL;
- for (r = expr->ref; r; r = r->next)
+ gfc_ref *rc = NULL;
+ for (gfc_ref *r = expr->ref; r; r = r->next)
if (r->type == REF_COMPONENT)
rc = r;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
index 0c038441a8c..9e1ab44144f 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2018-09-09 Janus Weil <janus@gcc.gnu.org>
+
+ PR fortran/86830
+ * gfortran.dg/typebound_call_30.f90: New test case.
+
2018-09-08 Marek Polacek <polacek@redhat.com>
PR c++/87150 - wrong ctor with maybe-rvalue semantics.
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/typebound_call_30.f90 b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/typebound_call_30.f90
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..3ca63bd2a95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/typebound_call_30.f90
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+! { dg-do compile }
+!
+! PR 86830: [8/9 Regression] Contiguous array pointer function result not recognized as contiguous
+!
+! Contributed by <only_for_nouse@gmx.de>
+
+module m
+ implicit none
+
+ type :: t1
+ contains
+ procedure :: get_ptr
+ end type
+
+ type :: t2
+ class(t1), allocatable :: c
+ end type
+
+contains
+
+ function get_ptr(this)
+ class(t1) :: this
+ real, dimension(:), contiguous, pointer :: get_ptr
+ end function
+
+ subroutine test()
+ real, dimension(:), contiguous, pointer:: ptr
+ type(t2) :: x
+ ptr => x%c%get_ptr()
+ end subroutine
+
+end module