This is the mail archive of the gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [PATCH 1/4] qsort_chk: call from gcc_qsort instead of wrapping it


On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:03 AM Alexander Monakov <amonakov@ispras.ru> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> This is an independently useful patch that makes it easier to introduce
> gcc_stablesort.
>
> Swap responsibilities of gcc_qsort and qsort_chk: call the checking function
> from the sorting function instead of wrapping gcc_qsort with qsort_chk.

OK.

>         * gcc/sort.cc (gcc_qsort) [CHECKING_P]: Call qsort_chk.
>         * gcc/system.h (qsort): Always redirect to gcc_qsort.  Update comment.
>         * gcc/vec.c (qsort_chk): Do not call gcc_qsort.  Update comment.
>
> diff --git a/gcc/sort.cc b/gcc/sort.cc
> index 293e2058f89..9f8ee12e13b 100644
> --- a/gcc/sort.cc
> +++ b/gcc/sort.cc
> @@ -229,4 +229,7 @@ gcc_qsort (void *vbase, size_t n, size_t size, cmp_fn *cmp)
>    mergesort (base, &c, n, base, (char *)buf);
>    if (buf != scratch)
>      free (buf);
> +#if CHECKING_P
> +  qsort_chk (vbase, n, size, cmp);
> +#endif
>  }
> diff --git a/gcc/system.h b/gcc/system.h
> index f87fbaae69e..203c6a4f0cf 100644
> --- a/gcc/system.h
> +++ b/gcc/system.h
> @@ -1197,17 +1197,13 @@ helper_const_non_const_cast (const char *p)
>  /* Get definitions of HOST_WIDE_INT.  */
>  #include "hwint.h"
>
> -/* qsort comparator consistency checking: except in release-checking compilers,
> -   redirect 4-argument qsort calls to qsort_chk; keep 1-argument invocations
> +/* GCC qsort API-compatible functions: except in release-checking compilers,
> +   redirect 4-argument qsort calls to gcc_qsort; keep 1-argument invocations
>     corresponding to vec::qsort (cmp): they use C qsort internally anyway.  */
>  void qsort_chk (void *, size_t, size_t, int (*)(const void *, const void *));
>  void gcc_qsort (void *, size_t, size_t, int (*)(const void *, const void *));
>  #define PP_5th(a1, a2, a3, a4, a5, ...) a5
>  #undef qsort
> -#if CHECKING_P
> -#define qsort(...) PP_5th (__VA_ARGS__, qsort_chk, 3, 2, qsort, 0) (__VA_ARGS__)
> -#else
>  #define qsort(...) PP_5th (__VA_ARGS__, gcc_qsort, 3, 2, qsort, 0) (__VA_ARGS__)
> -#endif
>
>  #endif /* ! GCC_SYSTEM_H */
> diff --git a/gcc/vec.c b/gcc/vec.c
> index beb857fd838..ac3226b5fcb 100644
> --- a/gcc/vec.c
> +++ b/gcc/vec.c
> @@ -201,21 +201,12 @@ qsort_chk_error (const void *p1, const void *p2, const void *p3,
>    internal_error ("qsort checking failed");
>  }
>
> -/* Wrapper around qsort with checking that CMP is consistent on given input.
> -
> -   Strictly speaking, passing invalid (non-transitive, non-anti-commutative)
> -   comparators to libc qsort can result in undefined behavior.  Therefore we
> -   should ideally perform consistency checks prior to invoking qsort, but in
> -   order to do that optimally we'd need to sort the array ourselves beforehand
> -   with a sorting routine known to be "safe".  Instead, we expect that most
> -   implementations in practice will still produce some permutation of input
> -   array even for invalid comparators, which enables us to perform checks on
> -   the output array.  */
> +/* Verify anti-symmetry and transitivity for comparator CMP on sorted array
> +   of N SIZE-sized elements pointed to by BASE.  */
>  void
>  qsort_chk (void *base, size_t n, size_t size,
>            int (*cmp)(const void *, const void *))
>  {
> -  gcc_qsort (base, n, size, cmp);
>  #if 0
>  #define LIM(n) (n)
>  #else
> --
> 2.13.3
>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]